On June 30 the Taiwan High Court reinstated the death penalty for the three men known as the "Hsichih Trio," Liu Bing-lang (
But perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the 16-year-long Hsichih Trio case has not received enough attention. This concerns the allegations that Liu, Su and Chuang were tortured into making confessions.
Over 16 years and through numerous deliberations, one thing has remained consistent: The justice system has refused to investigate the claim that these men were tortured.
This is more than disturbing. It indicates that they were never treated as innocent defendants whose guilt the prosecutors had to try to prove. Their testimony regarding torture fell on deaf ears.
It is outrageous to even have to explain this: An independent judiciary should worry when allegations surface that police are extracting confessions through torture.
In the Hsichih case, the Taiwan High Court has condemned the men based on no physical evidence. The confessions are key. But the Criminal Procedure Law (
The testimony Liu, Su and Chuang gave concerning their torture was credible. They were not vague, but rather provided details that ring true with what is known about torture methods used by abusive authorities around the world, of which the average person on the street knows little or nothing.
For example, Liu said: "[Police] put a thick yellow book against my chest and hammered me on the chest."
It is common for abusive authorities to choose beating methods that do not rupture the skin. This is because of the internal physical damage it inflicts while minimizing lasting, outward evidence of torture. The fact that Liu named this detail is chilling.
Su and Chuang said police applied electric shocks to their genitals and, in Su's case, swabbed on a chemical to increase the pain.
There is every reason to investigate, and no reason not to.
The first ruling in the Hsichih Trio case was handed down when Taiwan had not yet achieved democracy. The shocking decision by the High Court to reinstate the death penalty can not be blamed on autocracy.
Want to celebrate 20 years since the end of the world's longest implementation of martial law? Start by proving the nation's justice system has changed. President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) should commute the sentences of the Hsichih Trio immediately, based not only on the complete lack of physical evidence, but also on the fact that the torture allegations have been ignored.
Moreover, Taiwan cannot close this chapter without carrying out the investigation that should have started in 1991 into Liu, Su and Chuang's believable allegations of torture. Investigations into the possible use of torture are difficult, no less so when authorities let 16 years slip by without acting. But choosing not to investigate is not an option for a country that abides by the rule of law. It makes a mockery of the Criminal Procedure Law's ban on statements extracted through torture, violates laws directly banning torture and sends the message that Taiwan may not act in the future if other torture allegations arise.
Until an investigation takes place, Hsichih Trio defense lawyer Su You-chen's (
Celia Llopis-Jepsen is a writer based in Taipei.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with