I disagree with three points made in Chien Hsi-chieh's recent article ("A peaceful road to an independent state exists," July 13, page 8).
First, Chien's comparison with other breakaway states ignores the issue of historical grudges. In the examples Chien gives -- Norway becoming independent from Sweden, and Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia becoming independent from the Soviet Union -- there was no historical resentment between the original and the newly independent country, nor did the original country have any vital interests in the other. This is not the case between Taiwan and China.
Chinese junior-high textbooks have two pages dedicated to explaining the assets that were "stolen" from China by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) when it fled to Taiwan in 1949. The text emphasizes that this "booty" became the foundation of Taiwan's prosperity. The Chinese Civil War has left a troubled legacy that continues in China today, in which all Taiwanese are said to belong to "Chiang Kai-shek's (蔣介石) band of thieves."
Today, China needs Taiwanese investment for the development of its economy, so the Chinese grudgingly accept. But this history is branded deep in the heart of every Chinese. Taiwanese businesspeople are cheated, robbed, extorted and have their assets confiscated, which the Chinese consider merely interest on the property that the KMT took from them. Just think -- with the entire population manipulated by the state-run education system, how could the Chinese ever with peaceful independence for Taiwan?
Second, the issue of Taiwan involves China's resource interests. Only if China governs Taiwan can it confidently and fearlessly contend with the US for resources in the Pacific. Taiwan is key to these areas, so China will make heavy sacrifices or completely destroy Taiwan if it must to achieve that end. Propaganda and military intimidation may be a tactical trick, but with nearly 1,000 missiles pointed at Taiwan, wishful thinking of "peaceful independence" is not very practical.
Third, there is the issue of cultural ideals. As Chien said, we need to have confidence in our own system in order to create a harmonious atmosphere in which old and new immigrants can identify with Taiwan. This warning seems all the more apt coming from one who joined last fall's red-clad anti-corruption protests.
Indeed, the biggest obstacle to Taiwanese independence is that internally there is no harmonious atmosphere or feeling of identification with the land.
Our government, education system and environment still persuade many Taiwanese to identify with China. The people of this land have always lacked self-confidence and dignity, and the word "independence" seems to be almost exclusively used by politicians.
I have always believed that peace relies on strength and this includes the non-violent defense mentioned by Chien. He is an old warrior of social movements and presumably has learned a great deal from his experiences. I hope he will once more raise his flags and appeal to all Taiwanese to identify with this land, and reform the nation's outdated and pedantic education. When I hear that call, I will heed it.
Lee Shang-hsien is director-general of the Taiwan Pik Hap Culture Association.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry