Barring something drastic, the next president will be either the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) Ma Ying-jeou or the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) Frank Hsieh. Regardless of who is elected, there are some steps that need to be taken, or else Taiwan is going to go down the drain.
The following are five steps that the next presidential administration should take:
One, greatly expand nuclear energy. Taiwan is in a precarious situation. The nation is an island and almost totally dependent on oil imports from the Middle East for energy. This means that a hostile nation can blockade and cut off Taiwan's energy supply at will.
Nuclear energy is extremely clean, efficient, cheap and powerful. With nuclear energy, Taiwan will not only be more independent, but will also have cheaper and cleaner energy. Taiwan should undertake a rapid expansion program to have a total of 12 nuclear reactors by the year 2025, and perhaps 20 by the year 2040.
Two, increase annual defense spending to 3.5 percent of GDP. The current increase in the defense budget to 2.85 percent of GDP is a good thing, and President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has requested a further increase to 3 percent of GDP for next year's budget. That is insufficient, however.
Military spending has steadily declined ever since the DPP took power. The next presidential administration should increase defense spending in incremental levels -- from 3 percent next year to 3.2 percent in 2009 and 3.5 percent in 2010 and keep defense spending at that level. China is more dangerous a threat than ever, and Taiwan must take the necessary steps to strengthen its self defense capability.
Three, stop deficit spending. Taiwan's national debt -- only 6 percent of GDP in 1991 -- is now 39 percent and still growing. The next administration must reduce the national debt to an acceptable level, or even eliminate it entirely.
Four, permit direct links. Allowing direct transportation to China is a wise move regardless of whether one is pan-blue or pan-green. From the pan-blues' perspective, direct ties with China would translate into additional trade, business and investment in China. From the pan-greens' perspective, Taiwan is sovereign and has direct ties with every other sovereign nation in the world, so why not China?
Five, accelerate research and development of Taiwan's methane hydrate reserves. Researchers have discovered enormous methane hydrate reserves in surrounding territorial waters that, by some estimates, are sufficient to supply local energy needs for 60 years. This could be the energy source of the future. Taiwan should undertake efforts to exploit them rapidly. Additional funding should be diverted toward this project to enable Taiwan to begin exploiting methane hydrate reserves for commercial use by 2020.
Benjamin Fan
Chiunglin, Hsinchu County
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US