Before I tell you about the Pink Junkies (that growing tribe of otherwise sentient women who can't resist pink), I should admit that I'm not a very "pink" person. Too apologetic a shade for my liking, too passive, too "Don't worry, I won't bite."
In my experience, good men enjoy being worried; they quite like a woman with bite. However, even I have to accept that these days, pink is everywhere -- mobiles, barbecues, music sound systems. There are even pink Handyman tools, and Fly Pink, "A boutique airline designed especially for women" that has its very own pink airplanes.
It's like a pink Midas touch -- everything that can be touched (or, more to the point, merchandized) is turned pink, and the pinker it is the more women clamor to buy it. In this way pink isn't just a color any more, it's a lifestyle choice. Where the Pink Junkies are concerned, one could even call it a drug -- hen-party heroin for the masses.
One cannot help but wonder who allowed this to happen? Who let pink back in? For the longest time, pink was frowned upon as the color of gender conditioning, the hue that would make Barbie dolls of us all. Pink was also the working woman's Kryptonite -- wear it and you were corporate toast. Then slowly, imperceptibly, the rules fell away, and a good thing, too.
What's so awful about little girls loving pink? Ditto the teens, staggering out of high street chains with armfuls of pink sparkly every-thing. Much more worrying is that, these days, it's not just young girls -- it's grown women who are turning our pavements into churning oceans of girly pink. How often recently have I seen groups of women, in their thirties, forties and beyond, sashaying along in baby-pink velour tracksuits, or hot pink leggings, shrieking into bubblegum-pink phones.
Everywhere you look, grown women dressed up as little girls. It's horrifying. And bewildering.
It's not even as though every woman looks so pretty in pink. (It's a fine line between dewy youth and the full-blown Baby Jane.) In fact, only an elite set of women (and the occasional style-smart gay man) can do pink with aplomb. One example is glamor model Jordan, whose wedding was such a display of pink "shock and awe" one could only applaud.
The only surprise was that she didn't have husband Peter Andre dyed pink. Here was a woman, one of the very few, to make pink seem ultra-sexual and powerful: "You want pink, big boy, I'll give you pink."
Sadly, with most women, pink has entirely the opposite effect -- neutralizing them, taking away their edge.
And maybe for some of these women, that's the point -- as if, in these gender-blurred times, pink has become a short cut to express old-style softness and femininity.
It could even be that extremely tough women use pink to deflect attention from their true colors -- ruthlessness, ambition, drive. As in, "Yes I just broke your balls in that business meeting, but I'm wearing pink, so I'm lovely really."
Delving into the psychology of pink, questions must be raised. Could it really be the color of choice for those women who yearn to be like little girls again? Is being infantilized in this way the new female bliss? Tellingly, maybe, they're rumored to be shifting an awful lot of pink merchandise to divorced and separated women. What does this say -- that when reality bites hard, so hard it draws blood, it's time for a woman to reach for the pink stuff? Because then you are transported back to a time when everything is fluffy and pretty, and there are no monsters under the bed (or in it).
In which case, maybe one should call time on the tyranny of the pink junkies. One hears that some women have taken to hiding their pink phones when they are doing business, proving that there may be such a thing as "pink shame."
And so there should be. After all, when was the last time you encountered armies of grown men decked out in sailor suits, sucking their thumbs and wailing "Mummy?" The female of the species had better put pink in its place -- just a color after all, and hell on earth to keep clean.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS