For the first time, one of the nation's largest private foundations is venturing into virtual worlds to play host to activities and discussions and explore the role that philanthropy might play there.
The foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, is sponsoring events in Second Life, the online world.
The goals are to gain insight into how virtual worlds are used by young people, to introduce the foundation to an audience that may have little exposure to institutional philanthropy and to take part in and stimulate discussions about the real-world issues that it seeks to address.
"This is not just some fad or something new and interesting that we've grabbed onto," said Jonathan Fanton, MacArthur's president. "Serious conversations take place there, people are deeply engaged, and that led us to think that maybe a major foundation ought to have a presence in the virtual world as well."
Second Life says it has more than 7 million members, about one-third of them Americans. Each member uses a virtual self, known as an avatar, to navigate the virtual world.
The MacArthur foundation, perhaps best known for the so-called genius grants it hands out each year, has given the Center on Public Diplomacy of the University of Southern California US$550,000 to stage events in Second Life, including discussions of how foundations can address issues like migration and education.
In one such event on Friday, Fanton, whose avatar in Second Life is known as Jonathan MacFound, is going to discuss the role of philanthropy in virtual worlds with Philip Rosedale, the founder and chief executive of Linden Labs, the company that produces Second Life.
In an interview, Fanton said MacArthur planned to eventually open an office in a virtual world and make grants through it that will become actual grants in the real world.
"We're still figuring out how to do that," he said. "All of this is a learning experience."
Rosedale said making grants in the virtual world offered a way for foundations to explore concepts and develop programs before rolling them out.
"You can start things very cheaply in Second Life, play with them and let them germinate, and then put more behind them if and when they take off," he said.
Charities and other nonprofit groups are also beginning to migrate into the so-called metaverse, seeking ways of attracting new donors and hoping to educate a broader audience about the issues they address.
Adventure Ecology, a British group, staged a virtual flood in Second Life to show what global warming might bring, and a psychiatry professor at the University of California, Davis, created a way for his students to experience in Second Life what a person with schizophrenic hallucinations experiences.
"It's a wonderful awareness-building tool," said Beth Kanter, a nonprofit consultant. "You can walk someone through an experience there or sit down with them to discuss the work you're doing in a way that you can't in the real world or on the Web."
The American Cancer Society has had success in raising real money with virtual walkathons in Second Life. Randal Moss, the society's manager of innovation-based strategies and futurist, established an avatar in Second Life in 2004 and quickly noted that another avatar, named Jade Lily, was holding a silent auction to raise money for a charity.
His avatar, R.C. Mars, talked to Jade Lily and persuaded her to head a virtual cancer society walkathon. A few hundred avatars did that walk in 2005, raising US$5,000. This year's walk has raised US$82,000 at a cost of US$4,200 -- and it will not take place until the end of next month.
The benefits go beyond dollars.
"We benefit by increasing brand awareness," Moss said. "We've opened an office in Second Life, and through that, we will provide health information, link back to our Web site and provide space for community-based support groups to meet."
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with