Democracy activist Aung San Suu Kyi's house arrest in Myanmar was supposed to end last month, but the country's military junta decided to extend it for another year anyway.
This was yet another outrage for people around the world concerned about Myanmar. Aung San Suu Kyi has spent more than 11 of the last 17 years in detention despite tireless expressions of support for her from the rest of the world.
For a long time, I have worked to help refugees from Myanmar at the Thai border. I have always shared these people's hope that Aung San Suu Kyi will lead Myanmar toward democracy and peace, and the longing to return to their land and rebuild their homes.
For more than 20 years, these refugees have lived a life without legal status, without homes and without freedom of movement or a certain future. Aung San Suu Kyi not only symbolizes Myanmar's democratic movement, she also represents hope for displaced Burmese both within the country and abroad. She isn't willing to abandon her countrymen, choosing instead to face oppression by the military government.
Her non-violent resistance movement encourages countless Burmese and people from around the world to persist in their pursuit of democracy and peace.
The international community -- including the UN Commission on Human Rights, the EU and ASEAN -- has condemned Myanmar's military government for its brutishness in extending Aung San Suu Kyi's detention. It has urged the military to be responsive to the public desire for domestic unity by lifting tight controls on political activities, respect human rights and restore civil liberties.
Unfortunately, as with its handling of the Darfur conflict in Sudan, the Chinese government rejected a UN proposal for humanitarian intervention, saying it should not violate Myanmar's sovereignty by interfering with internal affairs.
I received a letter from a Burmese youth studying in Taiwan who wanted to spend his summer vacation helping Burmese refugees on the border with Thailand. We chatted on the Internet about the predicament of refugees and the difficulty of fleeing one's homeland for a foreign country to seek safety. Despite such hardship, Burmese troops often mercilessly crack down on minorities and dissidents in border regions.
When the student and I talked about whether or not Aung San Suu Kyi would be released, he said: "Under the Burmese military regime that I know, this would be impossible."
Whether she is released or not doesn't seem to be a pressing matter for many Taiwanese as it does not affect diplomatic or popular agendas. Because of its international status, Taiwan has limited options in offering protection to refugees and promoting Myanmar's democratization. But there is still a group of Taiwanese who care about Burmese refugees and who are continuing to do their best to help.
As members of the global village, it is an unshirkable responsibility of the Taiwanese government and public to express support for Aung San Suu Kyi and assist in Myanmar's democratic development.
Taiwan is striving to be a country built on a framework of human rights and which pushes for democratization across Southeast Asia. If it really wants to play a bigger role in the world community, shouldn't it spend less time arguing over whether it should have a Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall or a National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall and concern itself instead with human rights around the world? Couldn't it provide practical support to Aung San Suu Kyi and Myanmar's peace movement?
Sam Lai is a team leader in the Taipei Overseas Peace Service.
Translated by Marc Langer and Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with