Democracy activist Aung San Suu Kyi's house arrest in Myanmar was supposed to end last month, but the country's military junta decided to extend it for another year anyway.
This was yet another outrage for people around the world concerned about Myanmar. Aung San Suu Kyi has spent more than 11 of the last 17 years in detention despite tireless expressions of support for her from the rest of the world.
For a long time, I have worked to help refugees from Myanmar at the Thai border. I have always shared these people's hope that Aung San Suu Kyi will lead Myanmar toward democracy and peace, and the longing to return to their land and rebuild their homes.
For more than 20 years, these refugees have lived a life without legal status, without homes and without freedom of movement or a certain future. Aung San Suu Kyi not only symbolizes Myanmar's democratic movement, she also represents hope for displaced Burmese both within the country and abroad. She isn't willing to abandon her countrymen, choosing instead to face oppression by the military government.
Her non-violent resistance movement encourages countless Burmese and people from around the world to persist in their pursuit of democracy and peace.
The international community -- including the UN Commission on Human Rights, the EU and ASEAN -- has condemned Myanmar's military government for its brutishness in extending Aung San Suu Kyi's detention. It has urged the military to be responsive to the public desire for domestic unity by lifting tight controls on political activities, respect human rights and restore civil liberties.
Unfortunately, as with its handling of the Darfur conflict in Sudan, the Chinese government rejected a UN proposal for humanitarian intervention, saying it should not violate Myanmar's sovereignty by interfering with internal affairs.
I received a letter from a Burmese youth studying in Taiwan who wanted to spend his summer vacation helping Burmese refugees on the border with Thailand. We chatted on the Internet about the predicament of refugees and the difficulty of fleeing one's homeland for a foreign country to seek safety. Despite such hardship, Burmese troops often mercilessly crack down on minorities and dissidents in border regions.
When the student and I talked about whether or not Aung San Suu Kyi would be released, he said: "Under the Burmese military regime that I know, this would be impossible."
Whether she is released or not doesn't seem to be a pressing matter for many Taiwanese as it does not affect diplomatic or popular agendas. Because of its international status, Taiwan has limited options in offering protection to refugees and promoting Myanmar's democratization. But there is still a group of Taiwanese who care about Burmese refugees and who are continuing to do their best to help.
As members of the global village, it is an unshirkable responsibility of the Taiwanese government and public to express support for Aung San Suu Kyi and assist in Myanmar's democratic development.
Taiwan is striving to be a country built on a framework of human rights and which pushes for democratization across Southeast Asia. If it really wants to play a bigger role in the world community, shouldn't it spend less time arguing over whether it should have a Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall or a National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall and concern itself instead with human rights around the world? Couldn't it provide practical support to Aung San Suu Kyi and Myanmar's peace movement?
Sam Lai is a team leader in the Taipei Overseas Peace Service.
Translated by Marc Langer and Eddy Chang
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
During my twenty-two years in the US Senate, I became a student of Taiwan and its history. I was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific and International Cybersecurity Policy, and have made at least 25 trips to Taiwan and have been invited as an observer to two of the nation’s presidential elections. Taiwan’s continuous economic miracle has seen the nation transition from a mixed agricultural-industrial society at the end of Japan’s 50 years of jurisdiction to today’s economic powerhouse, unmatched by most nations of the world. Just as outstanding has been Taiwan’s decades of resistance and