With only a little more than three weeks left to find a running mate before the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) announces its presidential-vice-presidential ticket, former Taipei mayor and KMT chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
In his speech, Ma depicted the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government's foreign policies in the past four years as "amateurish, capricious, dogmatic and based on brinksmanship." To be fair, if Ma's point was that the DPP's foreign policies were less than successful, it is hard to seriously refute him.
However, highlighting the DPP's weakness will not, by itself, be enough to win him votes. Ma needs to convince the public-at-large that he and the KMT can do a better job than President Chen Shui-bian (
As many people will acknowledge, the biggest roadblock to the country's international participation has been the sovereignty of Taiwan. Ma referred to the DPP government's decision to seek WHO participation under the name "Taiwan" as being too dogmatic. The underlying message seems to be that dispute over the country's name is nothing but a dispute over formality, which should be secondary to substantive participation in international bodies.
However, many would disagree with Ma that the dispute is merely over form rather than substance.
Instead, the fundamental disagreement between two sides of the Taiwan Strait is the status of Taiwan.
Without this fundamental disagreement, there would be no disputes over the name. To the DPP and its supporters, we are what we call ourselves. If we call ourselves and allow others to call us names such as "Chinese Taipei" in international bodies, then we are essentially conceding Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan. To the KMT and its supporters, so long as we get to participate, the name under which we participate is of little importance.
However, it becomes more difficult for the KMT to sell this view once Taiwanese realize that pressure from Beijing is the reason why the KMT has adopted this position.
Even if Taiwan agrees to compromise on the name used in return for international participation, there is reason to doubt that China would approve Taiwan's participation at the international level. After all, it has been Beijing's longstanding policy to deny Taipei participation in international organizations, including non-political bodies.
This has much to do with the fact that as the Chinese government gains an increasing say in international bodies, its ability to obstruct Taiwan's ability to participate rises commensurately.
Under the circumstances, if Ma's idea of pragmatic diplomacy involves giving up more on the name issue, then despite all the talk, his view of foreign affairs would be a shallow one. For its part, his four-point proposal appears to be built on the "pragmatic diplomacy" of the KMT in the 1990s. However, cross-strait relations are an ever-evolving process. Neither China nor Taiwan is what it was 10 years ago.
It would therefore be naive to believe that a return to policies that may have worked 10 years ago is the way to run the nation's foreign affairs today.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to