Since it was proposed and discussed during a national conference on the development of sports in 2002, Taiwan's policy on a sports lottery has been constantly monitored by the public.
After President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) ordered the plan to be implemented on April 19, 2004, the National Council on Physical Fitness and Sports proceeded to hold three public hearings on the sports lottery to hear different opinions about the initial form of the plan. In 2005 former Premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) decided to take the "Public Service Lottery issuing regulations" as the legal source for issuing the law.
Last year, then Premier Su Tseng-chang (
In order to meet public expectations, to have careful distribution, and to promote the sports lottery in an appropriate manner, the Ministry of Finance and the National Council on Physical Fitness and Sports actively planned related measures to complement the plans, making the issuing of sports lottery tickets more concrete.
Thanks to the efforts of the related departments, the Ministry of Finance expects to be issuing sports lottery tickets by spring next year.
Currently there are 52 countries and 78 organizations issuing sports lottery tickets, and the average total sales per year are more than US$12 billion.
The benefits this brings about, in the form of sports popularity and economic benefits, are hard to estimate.
If we look at Hong Kong and Singapore, which rank first and second in the average amount spent on the lottery per person per year, we can get a glimpse into how much interest and involvement culturally Chinese people have in gaming.
In Taiwan, the debate on whether or not a sports lottery should be legalized has been going on for a long time. There are groups that support the idea and groups that oppose it, and each makes a strong case.
At the end of last year, the National Council on Physical Fitness and Sports carried out an opinion poll on sports lottery tickets. After it confirmed that more than 60 percent of the public is in favor of a sports lottery, the council formally proposed an application procedure for the issuing of sports lottery tickets at the end of last year.
This was done not only in the hope that it could infuse additional funds into sports budgets, provide substantial help in promoting sports, and diminish the social problem of illegal gambling by introducing a normalized, legal system.
It was also done in the hope that a sports lottery will be a catalyst for the sports industry, and that it will help bring about an environment of mutually beneficial, sustainable development.
I am confident about the future of the sport lottery tickets. Even though there are different points of view, we should still encourage dialogue and seek common ground.
I am not only looking forward to profits from the sports lottery being used for sports development, but I also hope that in the future I can see the entire country excited and enthusiastic about sports events.
Even more, I hope that Taiwanese society will enjoy a sports environment that is full of health, vigor, care and hope.
Chen Yue-hsin is former deputy chairman of the National Council on Physical Fitness and Sports.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
RSS