Taiwan's politicians probably think they are doing a good job.
They probably look at their multitudinous accomplishments -- even if all they have done this year is change a couple of signs and prevented any meaningful legislation from passing -- and say to themselves: "We're earning our pay, and we deserve all of these perquisites that we get."
It is pertinent to note that your average legislator makes upwards of NT$150,000 a month, or five times the average monthly wage in Taiwan, and can pull in about NT$600,000 a month to cover expenses like staffing, telephone bills and "constituent services." Officials at a variety of levels also receive a car and driver, government housing, huge stipends and, lest we forget, a sizeable monthly "special allowance," from which they can plunder willy-nilly.
When one ponders all of the time and effort that our politicians spend on the "issues of the day," it's not hard to end up wondering at their salaries.
The responses to the plan to rename Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall make up a spectrum of reactions from those who say it is a wonderful step forward for democracy (in the case of the pan-greens), those who argue it is an exploitation of ethnic conflict (in the case of the pan-blues), and those who believe it is a total rejection of history (in the case of a handful of veterans of the Civil War).
It is an emotional issue, and people will have emotional reactions. A more rational response would require one to question how important any of this really is. What is difficult to establish -- beyond the fact that the name plate on a pile of marble can upset people -- is how any of this could possibly affect anyone's daily life.
But of course, it is important to establish that it isn't merely the pan-greens who are immature and unreasonable.
It was no surprise when the Taipei City Government decided to fight fire with fire by renaming part of Ketagalan Boulevard the "Anti-Corruption Democracy Square." Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (
There is a very real problem with the way in which our politicians conduct business. Anyone who, at this late date, is still running around blaming "the other side" for the mind-numbingly facile political discourse in this country is simply not pausing long enough to let the oxygen reach his/her brain.
It is infuriating and irresponsible of these politicians to be so single-mindedly focused on pointless slanging matches when there are real problems that must be addressed.
For instance, Taipei County Councilor Wu Shan-jeou (
What was the response of our noble political leaders? They wasted no time in pointing the finger at each other and claiming that it was the other's fault. Wu's body was barely cold when People First Party Legislator Fu Kun-chi (
Is this the kind of opportunistic monkey that gets paid using our hard-earned tax dollars?
There is a legislative election coming up. It is hard to say how it will turn out, given that the number of seats in the legislature will be cut in half and the electoral system will change.
But it is already hard not to be happy. No matter what happens in December, one thing is certain: Half of these oafs will lose their jobs.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with