Last year, the US think tank RAND Corp issued a report titled Leveraging America's Aircraft Carrier Capabilities that considered several war scenarios, among them war in the Taiwan Strait.
In the scenario, Taipei reacts to China's refusal to allow the Taiwanese team to participate in next year's Olympic Games in Beijing by declaring its "new national status." A few weeks after the games, China announces a major military exercise north and east of Taiwan and demands immediate unification talks with Taiwan, which the Taiwanese government refuses.
On Jan. 15, 2009, China seizes two Taiwanese freighters and escorts them to a Chinese port, where, after inspection, the Chinese army announces that the cargo contained weapons and declares an immediate economic blockade of Taiwan. The entire Chinese army then mobilizes. The Taiwanese government also announces mobilization, declares martial law and calls for assistance from the US and the UN. The US president dispatches several carrier strike groups, long-range bombers and two marine expeditionary units to the western Pacific region, albeit not to Taiwan itself.
In response to US military pressure, China immediately declares that the US' activities amount to intervention in China's domestic affairs, while the Chinese ambassador to Japan submits a document to the Japanese government demanding that Tokyo remain neutral, warning that allowing the US to use Japanese military bases would be interpreted as an act of war against China.
On Jan. 20, Beijing launches a military attack on Taiwan. The Chinese army fires 200 conventional missiles at Taiwan's military bases, control centers and important economic centers. Thirty minutes after the initial attack, 250 fighter aircraft strike in an attempt to completely destroy Taiwan's military bases. Later the same day, a Taiwanese freighter is sunk about 320km east of Taiwan, probably by a Chinese submarine. As a result of the open hostilities in the Taiwan Strait, the US president orders the US military to take action to stop China from invading Taiwan. At this time, the Japanese government informs the US that unless it receives the approval of the Diet, Tokyo will not be able to grant the US access to military bases in Japan, while expressing the hope that the US will understand the heavy Chinese pressure on Japan.
This is where the RAND scenario ends. The report concludes that although the US has a naval and aerial advantage, a military conflict between the US and China would be extremely fierce, since China would be the most powerful enemy the US has faced in recent years. The reasons for this view are as follows.
First, the Chinese have an effective system for monitoring US warships. Second, China has a large number of warships, submarines and attack aircraft -- enough to deal the US navy a heavy blow. In addition, China's land-based anti-aircraft system cannot be ignored. Finally, just like the US Department of Defense, RAND believes that the risk of China using nuclear weapons cannot be eliminated. China may use nuclear weapons detonated on the ground or in the air to attack US control and intelligence-gathering systems, thus striking a destructive blow to US military capabilities.
War games such as Taiwan's annual Han Kuang series of exercises are a useful means of testing the worth of strategies that may one day have to be put into action in an actual conflict. But in its efforts to draw up plans to cope with a potential Chinese attack, the Ministry of Defense would do well to also pay attention to scenarios such as the one described by RAND.
Cheng Ta-chen is an independent defense analyst.
Translated by Perry Svensson
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to