Had it not been for a poor showing in the Council for Economic Planning and Development's latest business indicators report, few would be aware that the economy is moving into recession territory.
And had it not been for a suggestion by central bank Governor Perng Fai-nan (
Nevertheless, we will find out how the government is going to deal with this thorny issue this week after Vice Premier Tsai Ing-wen (
It all started when the council latest report indicated that the economy had slowed down last December. In the report, the council said the index of leading indicators -- designed to forecast economic activity three months ahead -- had dropped 1.1 percent to 107.8 points in December from the previous month, while the index of coincident indicators -- which measure the current pace of economic activity -- fell 0.4 percent month-on-month to 109.1 points.
What raised eyebrows, however, was the total score of the council's indicators, which declined five points to 16 points in December and flashed a "blue light" on the council's spectrum, indicating a recession, after six consecutive "yellow-blue" lights indicating a slowdown.
The unexpected recession warning came among predictions that the economy would experience a soft landing this year following forecasts of a slowdown in the US economy. It prompted public concerns, because the "blue light" was last seen during the SARS outbreak.
Nobody knows whether the "blue light" indicator for December is a temporary phenomenon, as suggested by the council. A recession is defined as two consecutive quarters of negative growth and the council blamed December's figures on a comparison with a "blip" of a positive growth that occurred a year earlier.
But Perng's suggestion that the nation ditch the monitoring indicators in order to avoid a distorted view of its economic health did raise questions about the accuracy of the indicators -- the method by which economic variables are analyzed may not be accurate enough to justify changes of "light" shown in the council's five-level spectrum system.
Launched in 1968 by the council to gauge domestic economic health, the components of the indicators have gone through several changes, with the aim of better predicting economic fluctuations. The five-level spectrum, for its part, serves as a convenient way to evaluate economic trends, with a "blue light" indicating a recession, a "yellow-blue light" a slowdown, a "green light" steady growth, a "yellow-red light" slight overheating and a "red light" full-blown overheating.
These indicators have lost much of their utility for predicting future economic trends because some of the components lack a correlation with the nation's economic development. The components focus mainly on manufacturing and export-oriented variables, while in fact the service sector and domestic demand now account for 73 percent of the GDP.
This does not mean that the council's indicators should be scrapped, however. Instead, they should be modified -- adding new variables and removing old ones -- so that they better reflect the health of the economy and better help forecast future trends. Most importantly, the government needs to return to basics in order to improve its performance on the economy, rather than concentrate too much on indicators.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with