US first lady Laura Bush announced last September that the US State Department was launching a Global Cultural Initiative (GCI) to integrate and expand cultural diplomacy. Bush believed that gaining an understanding of different cultures through their literature, music, film and other forms of visual arts was the best way to strengthen US friendship with other nations.
Arts and culture are a universal language that overcomes class barriers, crosses geographical boundaries and bridges political differences. They are also the best way to open up a full-fledged international dialogue.
Major global powers such as the US attach great importance to cultural diplomacy, and it be-hooves Taiwan to promote appreciation of foreign cultures as well. Given Taiwan's difficulties with traditional diplomacy, how can it afford not to strengthen and show off the "soft power" of its culture.
Taiwan's international political standing makes it extremely difficult for Taiwanese ambassadors and representatives to meet with other nations' high-ranking government officials through formal diplomatic channels.
In contrast, direct international cultural exchanges seem to encounter relatively fewer obstacles. Sending artists or performing arts troupes to other countries not only demonstrates the universality of culture, but also increases the visibility of Taiwan in the international community.
The cultural spirit that Taiwanese artists and performing arts troupes spread is a common experience that resonates with audiences worldwide. Cultural exchange is thus one way for Taiwan to reach out and participate in the global community.
Numerous Taiwanese visual artists, dancers, musicians and theater troupes have been honored for their achievements in major international arts events. Several performing arts troupes supported by the Council for Cultural Affairs have also gained international prestige. Viewing international arts events such as "Seeing Cloud Gate," (看見雲門), "Hearing the Sacred Drumming of U Theatre" (聽見優人神鼓) and "Meeting with Wu Hsing-kuo" (遇見吳興國) are the equivalent of "seeing Taiwan's face" and "hearing Taiwan's voice." These cultural images serve to make a deep impression of Taiwan on international audiences.
Cultivating outstanding artists and internationally renowned performing arts troupes takes time. Although a number of highly accomplished Taiwanese performing arts troupes have succeeded in captivating the hearts and souls of international audiences, much still needs to be done to ensure continuous development of world-class artists.
Whether or not more Taiwan-ese arts troupes can carry on this vision and achieve glory for the nation after a decade or two is a cause for concern. The Council for Cultural Affairs and the arts and literary scene in Taiwan must take action and make an all-out effort to promote Taiwan's cultural diplomacy. By bringing together talent and experts from different fields, the government can create a better environment to enhance artistic and literary creativity in Taiwan. This will not only raise Taiwan's cultural standard but also spread the voice of Taiwanese culture internationally.
Chiu Kun-liang is the minister for cultural affairs.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS