The space shot fired by China earlier this month has rattled windows in defense ministries and foreign offices from Washington to Tokyo to Moscow and beyond.
China secretly launched a missile on Jan. 11 to destroy one of its own aging weather satellites 800km into space. News of the blast was leaked to the authoritative magazine Aviation Week & Space Technology, whose reporters have cultivated sources in the US Defense Department and intelligence agencies for decades.
That immediately set off a furor of governments demanding that China disclose what it was up to. The Chinese government, evidently surprised by the reaction, stumbled and mumbled for several days before confirming the shot but downplaying its importance.
Diplomats and security officials in other capitals seem less than reassured. Taken together, they have pointed to five consequences:
● US military communications and intelligence gathering, which have become highly dependent on satellites, are more vulnerable than previously thought.
● China's space program, which is given high priority, is more advanced than had been believed, because hitting a satellite requires considerable sophistication.
● China's and space achievements add to what the Chinese call their "comprehensive national power," which includes economic, scientific and military strength.
● Several US, Japanese and other leaders asserted that the Chinese anti-satellite mission may set off an arms race in space, a contention Beijing denied.
● China's space program has long been a source of nationalistic pride as, in Chinese eyes, it shows that China is catching up with the industrial nations.
A white paper on space published by Beijing in October said that space was "a strategic way to enhance its economic, scientific, technological and national defense strength, as well as a cohesive force for the unity of the Chinese people."
An episode during the war in Iraq illuminates the dependence of the US armed forces on satellites. James Kitfield, a correspondent who wrote a book about Iraq entitled War and Destiny, reported that tanks of the 7th Cavalry Regiment were bogged down in a blinding sandstorm and fell into an Iraqi tank ambush.
Far above the fray, a Global Hawk drone sent radar probes through the storm and beamed pictures of the Iraqis by satellite to a base in California from which they were relayed to photo interpreters in Nevada. Their intelligence assessments were streamed by satellite back to a command center in Saudi Arabia from which a strike order went to a bomber over Iraq.
Within minutes of detection, precision-guided bombs hurtled through the sandstorm.
"The Iraqi armored formation below," Kitfield wrote, "would never have time to ponder how it had been so mercilessly exposed beneath the cover of a seemingly impenetrable storm at night."
An experienced China watcher says the Chinese are keen observers of US satellite usage. A Chinese article said US armed forces relied on 52 satellites in the Gulf War, on 86 in operations in Kosovo and more than 100 in the Iraq war. Another Chinese report says that, in Iraq, 95 percent of US intelligence relies on satellites, as well as 90 percent of communications and 100 percent of navigation.
China's space program started shortly after the Communists led by Mao Zedong (
Somewhere along the line, however, the Chinese began to forge an anti-satellite capability.
The October white paper reported on China's achievements in space over the last five years, including the launch of 22 different types of satellites, 46 launches of "Long March" missiles, three launch sites built and satellite-based telemetry expanded.
Perhaps most important was that China became the third country, after the US and Russia, to send men into space. The Shenzhou VI spacecraft with two astronauts aboard completed a five-day flight in October 2005.
For the next five years, the white paper set out an ambitious program that includes building a new generation of rockets, developing a high-resolution system to observe the Earth, launching direct TV broadcast satellites to reach remote areas of China and improving navigation satellites.
The regime in Beijing, which rarely misses a chance to justify itself before the Chinese people, claimed repeatedly in the white paper that China had accomplished this by itself under the guidance of the Communist Party.
"For a half century," the paper exclaimed, "China has worked independently ... and ... has made eye-catching achievements."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with