Recently the Chinese Nation-alist Party (KMT) proposed amendments to the Statute Governing the Reconstruction of Weathered Military Communities (
As with other public policies, this one involves social justice, the government's use of its political and financial resources and advantage versus marginalization. Of course there were possible issues with this amendment regarding the burden on the residents of the military communities, and the rights of the dispersed veteran families outside the communities. And it would be no surprise if the plan also involved the political and economic interests, as well as electoral considerations, of a minority of the legislators who raised the proposal.
The legislature is a place where people advocating different interests and viewpoints can engage in transparent debate. But the current manipulation by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is an example of the worst kind of public political discussion. It has taken the complex questions over the costs, benefits and overall fairness of the project and dumbed them down into an unfair struggle for resources between the weak Taiwanese and the advantaged Mainlander minority. This is a perfect example of how politics can divide Taiwanese society.
The DPP has always claimed it represents the progressiveness of Taiwan's diverse society and culture. Yet on the other hand, it encourages a minority of people to use the subject of Mainlander interests to twist Taiwan's political advancement.
Veteran families both inside and outside the veteran communities have never been purely made up of Mainlanders. The great majority are of mixed ethnicity. Not only did the first generation intermarry, but also the second, third and so on.
The Association of Mainlander Taiwanese is an organization which promotes the cultural preservation of veteran communities. We worry that after they are all torn down in 2009, one of Taiwan's most important cultural features will be lost overnight. That is why last year we pressed for a non-partisan amendment to incorporate cultural preservation into the statute, so that reconstruction efforts would also work to preserve cultural and architectural artifacts, and give counties and cities another opportunity to participate.
This year we also want to earn a NT$10 million budget in the hope of preserving Taiwan's diverse culture, the aesthetic beauty of the communities and to create a community atmosphere in which coexistence is respected.
Today, people working to preserve the culture of the veteran communities feel as if they've been unfairly drawn into a conflict which is not of their making. We sincerely call on the ruling and opposition parties, the MOD and all members of society to look more broadly at the facts.
Stop using ethnic smears as an argument, and instead communicate by discussing the matters at hand. Acknowledge the diversity of the veteran communities. Seek to promote ordinary citizens and a spatial and cultural transformation by building communities. Create the possibility of a new form of diverse Taiwanese culture.
Chang Mao-kuei is a research fellow at the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica and president of the Association of Mainlander Taiwanese. Translated by Marc Langer
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with