Reading the editorial "Act now to deal with climate change" (Jan. 2, page 8), I wasn't particularly surprised to learn that Taiwan is a relatively large producer of greenhouse gases. It contributes 1% of the world's carbon emissions but accounts for less than 0.4 percent of the world's population.
The article claimed that to remedy the situation businesses need to change and become more ecologically aware. No doubt this is true, but another problem needs to be tackled first.
Since coming to Taiwan a little over four years ago, I've been amazed by people's lack of regard for environmental issues. Whether they're pumping gas into their SUVs, filling their garbage cans with huge amounts of plastic and paper, or burning up the gas and emptying the water tanks with hour-long showers, it seems that many Taiwanese are only too ready not only to produce huge amounts of carbon but also to use up the world's resources.
There are a few silver linings in this black acid-rain cloud hanging over Taiwan. On an individual level, more people are recycling. With ever stricter controls over what -- and how -- we throw things away, this is a trend that looks set to continue. On a national level, Taiwan is looking to various forms of renewable resources to meet part of its energy demands. But more needs to be done.
The most important thing is that people make changes to their daily lives. Driving smaller, more fuel-efficient cars, buying products with less packaging and limiting the use of air conditioners would be a good start. Changes like these, however, will not simply happen of their own accord.
The obligation to make them happen must lie with the government.
By legislating against environmentally irresponsible behavior, passing laws that would tax vehicles with high fuel consumption, or fining households that use excessive amounts of water, the government would force people to become responsible for their actions.
But this would only be half the answer. It is also important that the nation become enthusiastic about green issues. By educating people about the harmful effects of pollution and how they can make a difference, the government could raise awareness of, and interest in, environmental issues.
These measures do a lot to clean up the country and reduce the 10 tonnes of carbon the average Taiwanese person generates each year. Only when people become interested in that issue will businesses get serious about reducing their impact on the environment.
Andrew Crosthwaite
Minhsiung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with