As the year draws to an end, it is clear that bad consumer loans were among the most important problems that the banking sector faced. Industry consolidation cases and corporate default probes will also be remembered as issues over which no small amount of ink was spilled.
Instead of contributing to the nation's economy, the banking sector may actually have dented it. So much so that rumors circulated that some banks planned to drop their year-end parties due to increasing debt and dropping revenues.
After learning that some overstretched borrowers had committed suicide because of their large credit card or cash card debts, banks and the Financial Supervisory Commission initiated in April a card-debt negotiation mechanism for cardholders which allowed flexible pricing on debt payback and other beneficial conditions for unemployed debtors and low-income debtors.
For a while, as banks strengthened their risk management procedures and borrowers learned how to use the various credit reimbursement tools at their disposal, the problem seemed to have come under control. The commission's latest data shows that the number of credit cards in circulation dropped 14.75 percent from a year ago to 39 million cards in October. The number of cash cards fell to 2.3 million in October, down 37.33 percent from a year ago.
Stock of credit card debt declined by 25.39 percent year-on-year to NT$367.8 billion (US$11.29 billion) for credit card usage, while total cash card debt shrank by 28.12 percent to NT$193.9 billion from a year earlier.
Some said the consumer credit crisis could, at the earliest, bottom out in the second quarter of next year. But whether the sector will start to show healthy growth in the coming year will depend on key consumer debt legislation which will be reviewed by lawmakers this week.
Late last year, lawmakers managed to pass a bill to cap the maximum lending rates on consumer loans, but stopped short of pushing forward with a third reading of the proposal after academics and investors said that it represented a step backward in the nation's financial liberalization.
This week, three versions of the proposed personal bankruptcy legislation are expected to be brought to a vote in the legislature. These drafts -- including a consumer debt resolution act drafted by the Judicial Yuan -- will remind us once again of the importance of seeking a balance between helping individuals who cannot repay their personal debt and must therefore seek bankruptcy protection and ensuring the banking sector's stability and long-term competitiveness.
Taking the draft legislation's impact on society, the economy and the nation's reputation into full account, the joint banking committee of the American and European Chambers of Commerce earlier this year warned that proper conditions, limits and safeguards must be adopted to prevent a possible "moral hazard" situation where some debtors may try to avoid paybacks through the projected personal bankruptcy legislation.
These conditions, limits and safeguards -- such as proper safeguards against possible abuse and independent debt counseling for bankruptcy seekers -- will amount to nothing if they are not seen as an instrument of last resort.
To establish the nation's first consumer insolvency regime, lawmakers will need to approach the legislation with care. As for credit abusers, some limits should be made on their lifestyles and measures taken against overspending.
There is no such thing as a free lunch. Ultimately, debtors have to pay.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with