The greatest value of language lies in the fact that it serves as a tool by which human beings can communicate and understand each other.
Effective communication not only consolidates Taiwanese consciousness and strengthens national identity but can also stimulate and tap into the power of citizens to realize the goal of normalizing Taiwan's status as a country.
On Nov. 21, in an article entitled "A little generosity in exchange for a lot of votes" published in the Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) Chang Shih-hsien (張世賢), a board member of the Association for Hakka Studies, argued that we should make good use of language as it is the tool for building domestic consensus.
Chang also added that we must give serious thought to how we use language to push for a change of the nation's title, the creation of a new constitution and when seeking UN membership.
This approach to expanding Taiwanese identity is very important.
After the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) retreated to Taiwan in 1949, it emphasized Mandarin as the official language and suppressed the development of the languages spoken by other ethnic groups.
This resulted in the younger generations of Hoklo, Hakka and Aboriginal groups having no choice but to use Mandarin as their primary spoken language when communicating with others.
This has affected the potential for all ethnic groups to learn each other's languages and made it difficult for them to understand each other.
Therefore, knowing how to promote mutual understanding through effective communication has become crucial in terms of consolidating internal consensus on the question of national identity.
In the short term, the focus should be on the question of how to build consensus. Until Mandarin can be replaced, it should be temporarily accepted as the primary language of communication.
In the meantime, we should take every single opportunity at our disposal to build the idea of a common Taiwanese identity to win further public support and strengthen a national identity focused on Taiwan consciousness.
In the long term, we should focus on expanding the meaning of the "Taiwanese language" while ensuring the equality of other languages.
In addition to promoting native language education, the languages of the different ethnic groups that make up the fabric of Taiwan should be given protection under the Constitution by defining Hoklo as "Hoklo Taiwanese," Hakka as "Hakka Taiwanese," Aboriginal languages as "Aboriginal Taiwanese" and the language of the new inhabitants as "New Taiwanese" and in the end officially recognizing all these languages as "Taiwanese."
We should also guarantee the right of every individual to publicly and freely express his or her opinion in the native language of their choice.
Translation services should also be provided based on actual needs to avoid the creation of language barriers and miscommunication resulting from language differences.
Adjusting the nation's policies to accommodate the Taiwanese ethnic environment, respecting language differences and forming a multilingual society should contribute to a feeling of unity among Taiwanese.
Chen Lung-chu is chairman of the New Century Foundation and director of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with