Although we at the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) believe that our organization does not deserve the scathing treatment you awarded it in your editorial ("FAPA's misguided pie in the sky," Dec. 8, page 8), we appreciate the publicity you gave to our idea of having the AIT director confirmed by the Senate.
We want to emphasize that this idea is not meant as a criticism of former, current or future AIT directors. This is about making Taiwan a "normal" country and taking another step toward normalizing its relations with the international community, including the US.
We agree that Director Stephen Young is doing a good job, but that is beside the point. The point is that a formal confirmation would give the Senate the opportunity to discuss the substance of US policy towards Taiwan with the designated candidate who will represent the US in Taiwan. As it is, there are too few opportunities for such an exchange.
As for "pie in the sky," most issues FAPA has taken up over the years seemed impossible at first. When we started in 1982, the main issues were human rights and democracy in Taiwan as well as ending martial law and the KMT's one-party rule. Many people told us that this would be impossible, but through hard work and persistence we succeeded.
Other topics we raised have been realized, such as enabling Taiwanese-Americans to list "Taiwan" as place of birth in their US passports instead of "China" and getting the US to explicitly support Taiwan's meaningful participation in the WHO.
We agree with you that holding the moral high ground is the best strategy, but disagree that Taiwanese can just sit back and watch the Chinese government evolve or dissolve. In light of China's size, rise and importance, ingenuity will be required to safeguard Taiwan's freedom, democracy and security.
Finally, Taiwan has enjoyed bipartisan support in Congress. In fact, we may modestly say that this is in part the result of our work with Congress over the past 24 years.
But each new Congress provides new opportunities, and experience has taught us that congressional support for Taiwan comes easier when the administration and Congress are controlled by different parties. Therefore, this new Congress may be more willing to challenge some of the established positions and wisdoms.
The basic question is whether we should think outside the box and explore all possibilities to help Taiwan become a normal country, or sit back and risk gradual erosion of Taiwan's international position.
Let your readers be the judge.
C.T. Lee
President
Formosan Association for Public Affairs
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with