Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤)successfully negotiated the political minefield of back-to-back visits to India and Pakistan as all three nations focused on the benefits of closer trade ties, analysts said.
Hu was due back in Beijing on Sunday after a near blemish-free week on the subcontinent, where he sold the message to a slightly skeptical India of the riches that China offered and oversaw a free-trade pact with close ally Pakistan.
"If India and China take the necessary steps to strengthen trade and business, the 21st century will be Asia's," Hu said in Mumbai as he urged the two nations to work harder towards a free-trade pact.
Earlier in the visit, the world's two most populous nations agreed to double trade to US$40 billion by 2010 and push ahead with efforts to settle a long-festering border row that brought them to war in 1962.
In Islamabad, Hu and Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf oversaw the signing of a free-trade agreement and committed their two nations to expanding their ties in other spheres such as the military.
Officials said the trade deal could triple trade between China and Pakistan to US$15 billion within five years.
"This serves the fundamental interests of our two peoples and is also conducive to the peace and development of our region," Hu said.
He was in Lahore on Sunday for the inauguration of an electronics plant and a "higher economic zone" being set up by China.
Hu's trip to both countries, the first by a Chinese president since Jiang Zemin (
While China wanted to engage India and continue to improve ties that still suffer from Cold War animosities, it did not want to do that at the expense of its alliance with Pakistan or by upsetting the sensitive regional balance.
"In the past, when Chinese leaders visited these two countries, they always went to Pakistan first and then India," said Zhang Li (張立), a professor with the Institute of South Asian Studies at China's Sichuan university.
"But this time Hu Jintao visited India first. There's something in that. China's South Asian policy has changed in recent years. China is now carrying out a balanced diplomatic relationship with India and Pakistan," Zhang said.
Aside from their ongoing territorial dispute and India's concern about China's cosy ties with Pakistan, Beijing and New Delhi have also increasingly become competitors globally for energy and other natural resources.
But while Indian industry chiefs and government leaders may not be prepared to trust China and remain concerned over security issues, they do understand that engaging the Asian economic powerhouse is the only way forward.
"Why should we cut off our nose to spite our face? The process of engagement on trade will continue despite security concerns," said G. Parthasarathy, a former Indian ambassador to China.
T.S. Vishwanath, head of international trade policy at the Confederation of Indian Industry, India's leading business lobby, said both nations understood the "huge opportunities" in working together.
"Both economies are growing very well. Both can serve as markets for each other. They realize it can be a win-win scenario for both of them," Vishwanath said.
From Pakistan's perspective, the need for China to build closer ties with India is understood and it is not a major concern because Beijing is also very intent on expanding its alliance with Islamabad.
"China is deepening its relations with India ... but Pakistan is not losing as a result," said Hasan Askari Rizvi, a former professor of political science at Lahore's Punjab University.
Rizvi and other observers in Pakistan also felt comfortable that their country would continue to have a much stronger friendship with China than India for many years to come.
"Our edge over India is we have a long-term and special relationship with China ... India can never match that," said Ishtiaq Ahmed, professor of international relations at Islamabad's Quaid-i-Azam University.
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his