Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤)successfully negotiated the political minefield of back-to-back visits to India and Pakistan as all three nations focused on the benefits of closer trade ties, analysts said.
Hu was due back in Beijing on Sunday after a near blemish-free week on the subcontinent, where he sold the message to a slightly skeptical India of the riches that China offered and oversaw a free-trade pact with close ally Pakistan.
"If India and China take the necessary steps to strengthen trade and business, the 21st century will be Asia's," Hu said in Mumbai as he urged the two nations to work harder towards a free-trade pact.
Earlier in the visit, the world's two most populous nations agreed to double trade to US$40 billion by 2010 and push ahead with efforts to settle a long-festering border row that brought them to war in 1962.
In Islamabad, Hu and Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf oversaw the signing of a free-trade agreement and committed their two nations to expanding their ties in other spheres such as the military.
Officials said the trade deal could triple trade between China and Pakistan to US$15 billion within five years.
"This serves the fundamental interests of our two peoples and is also conducive to the peace and development of our region," Hu said.
He was in Lahore on Sunday for the inauguration of an electronics plant and a "higher economic zone" being set up by China.
Hu's trip to both countries, the first by a Chinese president since Jiang Zemin (
While China wanted to engage India and continue to improve ties that still suffer from Cold War animosities, it did not want to do that at the expense of its alliance with Pakistan or by upsetting the sensitive regional balance.
"In the past, when Chinese leaders visited these two countries, they always went to Pakistan first and then India," said Zhang Li (張立), a professor with the Institute of South Asian Studies at China's Sichuan university.
"But this time Hu Jintao visited India first. There's something in that. China's South Asian policy has changed in recent years. China is now carrying out a balanced diplomatic relationship with India and Pakistan," Zhang said.
Aside from their ongoing territorial dispute and India's concern about China's cosy ties with Pakistan, Beijing and New Delhi have also increasingly become competitors globally for energy and other natural resources.
But while Indian industry chiefs and government leaders may not be prepared to trust China and remain concerned over security issues, they do understand that engaging the Asian economic powerhouse is the only way forward.
"Why should we cut off our nose to spite our face? The process of engagement on trade will continue despite security concerns," said G. Parthasarathy, a former Indian ambassador to China.
T.S. Vishwanath, head of international trade policy at the Confederation of Indian Industry, India's leading business lobby, said both nations understood the "huge opportunities" in working together.
"Both economies are growing very well. Both can serve as markets for each other. They realize it can be a win-win scenario for both of them," Vishwanath said.
From Pakistan's perspective, the need for China to build closer ties with India is understood and it is not a major concern because Beijing is also very intent on expanding its alliance with Islamabad.
"China is deepening its relations with India ... but Pakistan is not losing as a result," said Hasan Askari Rizvi, a former professor of political science at Lahore's Punjab University.
Rizvi and other observers in Pakistan also felt comfortable that their country would continue to have a much stronger friendship with China than India for many years to come.
"Our edge over India is we have a long-term and special relationship with China ... India can never match that," said Ishtiaq Ahmed, professor of international relations at Islamabad's Quaid-i-Azam University.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with