Following prosecutor Eric Chen's (
The anti-Chen demonstrations are dwindling, and the pan-blue camp has yet to launch any particularly effective attack, but the president is still at risk -- from those within his own party.
Several members of Chen's inner circle, including former close aides and advisers, have withdrawn their support. This development could ultimately result in a split in the pan-green camp.
Last Thursday, former senior presidential adviser Luis Kao (
Yesterday, DPP legislators Lee Wen-chung (
Lin and Lee were important leaders of the DPP's New Tide faction. It will be interesting to see if their decision will have a domino effect among their former faction colleagues and/or lead to the creation of a new anti-Chen force.
Chen Shui-bian believes that the root of the "state affairs fund" scandal is a flawed system, the result of inconsistencies between accounting and auditing bodies. Chen has taken this line in his defense against the attacks on him by the pan-blue camp and former DPP chairman Shih Ming-teh's (
Chen must think carefully about his next move. If he decides to fight until the end, he must immediately convene a meeting of the DPP's Central Executive Committee. Party members and legislators must engage in frank and open dialogue and find a way for Chen and the DPP to handle the scandal that will do the least possible damage to the party and government.
Chen must also consider the enormous and unprecedented uncertainty in Taiwanese politics that his departure would present, be it through resignation or temporary leave. For the sake of political and social stability, as well as cross-strait and international security, it's all the more important for Chen and the DPP to have a comprehensive plan mapped out to avoid more turmoil.
This is a difficult choice, but Chen needs to make the right decision and soon. Otherwise the crisis will escalate.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with