It goes without saying that the past few months have been an ordeal for President Chen Shui-bian (
The most recent bombshell was the indictment of first lady Wu Shu-jen (
The most damaging indictment against Wu was that for embezzling NT$15 million (US$455,500).
It is true that the amount Wu is alleged to have embezzled is trivial in comparison to past amounts that others have taken from the country's assets.
True, it is trivial in comparison to fortunes amassed by others in exploiting past privileged positions in a one-party state where paper trails were destroyed and prosecution basically forbidden.
Nevertheless, embezzlement is still embezzlement, and Wu should be punished if she is found guilty.
Which is why, at 8pm on Sunday, Chen came out and addressed the nation and laid his cards on the table.
If the verdict in Wu's case is guilty, he would not take advantage of his right to appeal, but would step down, he said.
In his own defense, Chen said that over the past six years, of his own volition, he cut his salary in half.
The amount thus lost to him was double the petty amount his wife is accused of embezzling.
If he had sought the office of president for the money, he said, he would not have given half his salary up in the first place.
The real issue here, however, is much more than the small amount the first lady is accused of embezzling.
The real issue is a deeper matter: that of the special funds that the nation's chief executive can flexibly spend in the interests of the country, and which secret expenses require invoices and which do not.
The confusion over the special funds is clear in the accounting practices used to examine presidential spending, with expenses that were allowed and unchallenged in 2002 that are now being challenged as illegal.
A further issue is that of secrecy. In the past, former president Lee Teng-hui (
By stating this, he exposed the fact that Taiwan had spies and moles within the People's Republic of China who provided the information.
These people were subsequently executed.
Now Taiwan's prosecutors are pressing Chen for information on those who can verify certain expenditures, some of whom are undoubtedly working in China.
No, there is much more at stake for Taiwan's developing democracy than the trivial amount Wu is alleged to have embezzled -- what is really at stake is the manner in which the nation has been forced to operate in the international arena.
As Taiwan and the world watch for the result of the first lady's embezzlement trial, let us hope that all have the ability to see the wider context surrounding it and the issues involved before they rush to judgment.
This matter is far from over.
Jerome Keating is a Taiwan-based writer.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with