China's weekend summit with Africa marked a milestone in its global emergence, giving it more leverage against the West and setting it up for more oil and other trade deals, analysts said yesterday.
The turnout for the two-day summit in Beijing that ended on Sunday spoke volumes. Delegations from 48 African nations attended, including 41 heads of state or government -- an illustration of Beijing's growing clout.
"[China] gave a party and everybody came. It's a big deal," said David Zweig, an expert on Chinese foreign policy at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
China's state press wasted no time trumpeting the summit as a "milestone."
"It consolidated the traditional friendship between Chinese and African people [and] injected new energy into China-Africa cooperation," an editorial in the People's Daily said yesterday.
China has faced accusations that it worsens repression and human rights abuses in Africa through support for countries such as Sudan and Zimbabwe in a cynical drive to increase access to African oil and other resources.
There has also been criticism that Beijing undermines the current Western policy of denying aid to countries with repressive governments.
But China shrugged off those claims during the summit and served notice it would continue to challenge the Western diplomatic and economic strategies for Africa.
Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
China also said it would double aid by 2009 and would offer US$5 billion in loans and credit to African countries.
And unlike the approach from the US and institutions such as the IMF, the offers came with no democracy or human rights strings attached, freeing up nations such as Sudan to get easy money.
"Now, some countries can get aid and investment without improving on [human rights and democracy] issues. This is another challenge to the Western countries," said Yen Chen-shen (嚴震生), a researcher at Taiwan's Institute of International Relations.
China sweetened the diplomatic deal even further with a US$1.9 billion package of trade and investment deals in Africa.
They included an aluminum production plant in Egypt worth US$938 million, a US$300 million contract for Chinese firms to upgrade a highway in Nigeria, a US$200 million copper project in Zambia, and other deals with Sudan, South Africa, Kenya, Cape Verde and Ghana.
Contrary to expectations, no major African energy deals were announced during the summit, but the goodwill engendered here will no doubt lead to greater Chinese access to African energy resources, Yen said.
"China needs energy from Africa. It needs to import a lot of oil nowadays since its economy is growing so fast, and China can get it from African countries through the summit," he said.
Turning Western criticism around, China sought to seize the moral high ground by calling in a joint communique for greater investment and aid from rich nations to help poor African countries, regardless of who governs them.
"They don't talk about it but in some way they are challenging the moral position of the IMF and the United States on conditional aid. I think this is very important for the Chinese," Zweig said.
Africa was high on China's agenda during the Cold War, when Beijing was diplomatically isolated and desperate to expand its sphere of influence.
That waned beginning in the 1980s, Zweig said, as the need for technology and capital prompted China to reach out to the West and Japan.
But with those relationships now quite solid, China sees a resumption of its traditionally strong African ties as further bolstering its international clout.
"I think it's significant. It's the biggest event in terms of China refocusing its attention on the developing world," Zweig said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with