The folk museums and song festivals of the three Baltic states are all in the open air as vital reminders -- for children and tourists alike -- of hard-won national identities so distinct from the Russian culture next door.
Yet the independence of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania is under threat once more and not just because they have exchanged the Soviet Union for the EU. What this has led to, however, is the free movement of capital and labor, encouraging emigration from the Baltic states as well as penetration of their economies by Nordic and Polish firms.
This started way back in the Communist era with a ferry from Helsinki to the Estonian capital Tallinn: now those two cities' stock-exchanges have merged. Finland's leading department store, Stockmann, now has a branch in both Tallinn and Riga, capital of Latvia. In Latvia and Lithuania, drinks companies have been taken over by Danish breweries like Carlsberg. Nokia has become the leading mobile phone in the Baltics.
Foreign-owned
More than half of the 7 million people in the three republics bank with Hansa of Sweden while Nordic insurers have been pipped only in Lithuania by PZU, a Polish group which is also the owner of the oil refinery that serves all the states. The biggest hotels in Tallinn, Riga and Vilnius, Lithuania -- all former Intourist showpieces -- are now owned by a Norwegian group, while various Scandinavian carriers dominate regional aviation.
This opening-up has also led to thousands of Latvians, Estonians and Lithuanians flying out to jobs in the West. Ireland has opened diplomatic posts in Vilnius, Riga and Tallinn, to deter job-seekers, since there are already 30,000 people from the three republics in Dublin alone.
Emigration, albeit enforced, is nothing new to the Baltic peoples, the first wave being westward to avoid Tsarist oppression more than a century ago. Then, World War II resulted in half a million of them being deported to Siberia where most died. However, after the war, 30,000 Estonians, 135,000 Latvians and many more Lithuanians escaped through Sweden or Germany where there are still large Baltic communities.
Since the collapse of communism, another 300,000 have freely emigrated from Lithuania alone, while Latvia's figure may also be around a tenth of the population. Estonia is officially owning up to only 8,000 leavers.
Only a few of these were Russians returning to the motherland -- or elsewhere.
Yevgenia Gehsbarga, an office-worker in Riga, complained, "Discrimination drove my grandmother to Chicago."
The 6,000 Latvians there are probably outnumbered by migrants from Lithuania but there are now 100,000 Latvians scattered across the US.
Latvian President Vaira Vike-Freiberga told me: "Many did go to North America in the nineties, but Latvians now prefer the EU. Some bring new skills home, but we have no program to woo emigrants back."
Paradoxically, this former lecturer at McGill University grew up in Montreal after her parents escaped in 1940.
That was nine years before those of Arturas Paulauskas made it to Chicago, from which he returned to become Lithuania's parliamentary speaker. Both are untainted by a Soviet past, as is Estonian Prime Minister Andrus Ansip, who has relatives in California.
There are Baltic communities in Sydney and Melbourne too, but Australians who have returned to their parents' homeland include Brigita Stroda at Inspiration Riga, the Nordic-backed convention bureau, and Ray Vysniauskas who edits Lithuania Today. The paper recently interviewed Feriandas and Inga Greblikas, both doctors, who migrated to Toronto in disgust at the lack of real democracy, warning that depopulation would leave only pensioners governed by relics of the Soviet era.
Dwindling
An example of the dwindling manpower is a Latvian shipyard that recently sent an order abroad after Ukrainian and Belarussian labor was barred, although 1,000 Russians got menial jobs in booming Estonia last year.
Paradoxically, although inside the EU only Slovakians are worse paid than Baltic workers, they still have higher living-standards than other peoples of the old USSR -- such as the Kyrghiz waitress who served me in Riga.
Even Lebanese and Africans are trying to get local visas, according to Mike Johnson, a Californian travel agent in Riga, who warns, "Only a top-down policy can outlaw the old ways that stifle service, incentive and productivity."
Other observers think the Baltic republics should copy Ireland's homecoming campaign, and in Estonia the problem is being addressed at the University of Tartu, an ancient Swedish foundation.
Its spokeswoman, Liina Jurgen, told me: "Thanks to our scientific reputation and foreign investment -- Samsung is paying for research -- we may well get our top specialists back from countries like the USA."
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with