This week, a newspaper in Montenegro ran a headline saying "We Have Our Own Country," a reflection of what the Montenegrins have long hoped for. A majority of Montenegrins voted for independence in a referendum on Sunday, ending Montenegro's union with the much larger Serbia and breaking up the last remnant of federal Yugoslavia.
Over the past two decades, two countries in the European region have disintegrated. The first disintegration took place when the Soviet Union split into 15 separate nations. The second one occurred when Yugoslavia broke up into six separate countries. The dissolution of these two countries has shown a respect for democratic principles and the right of self-determination.
Although the disintegration of federal Yugoslavia led to severe conflict, Croatia, Bosnia, Macedonia and Slovenia broke away from Yugoslavia to become sovereign nations. Montenegro's secession has left Serbia the only member of a federal Yugoslavia and so that name can no longer be used.
Montenegro's efforts to split from Serbia were peaceful and clearly showed the greatest respect for the public's choice. First of all, the results of the referendum were not collectively decided by those living within federal Yugoslavia, but by the people of Montenegro themselves in a local referendum. Serbia is eight times larger than Montenegro and its population 11 times greater.
If the future of Montenegro had been collectively decided by the Serbs, it would have been a classical example of how a larger nation bullies a smaller and how the larger nation deprives the people of the smaller nation of their right to choose.
In recent years, the independence of East Timor and Slovakia have also been achieved as a result of the local people's decision rather than by being decided in a "collective decision" also made by outsiders. In the past, the independence referendum in Quebec was also decided by people living in Quebec rather than collectively by all Canadians. This also demonstrates a respect for the principle of local self-determination.
Montenegro's successful independence should also be credited to Serbia. Serbia is already a democracy. It did not threaten to use military force against Montenegro when it decided to hold an independence referendum.
In fact, three years ago Serbia agreed to let Montenegro hold such a referendum to decide its relationship with the Yugoslav federation, and stated that it would respect the results of that referendum. This was very similar to what happened when Slovakia and the Czech Republic split up a few years ago. It was also a very peaceful separation, mainly because then-president Vaclav Havel and the majority of the Czech people respected the people's right to choose.
Although the pro-unification faction within Montenegro was strongly opposed to Montenegrin independence, they still held on to democratic principles by agreeing to make "independence" one of the options in the referendum and refraining from setting a high threshold for the referendum. They agreed to rules laid down by the EU, whereby separation would require at least 55 percent of votes cast, with at least half of the electorate participating.
Following the independence of Montenegro, Kosovo -- formerly in union with Yugoslavia but now enjoying autonomy -- will be next in letting the public decide on the question of independence. The disintegration of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia has created 20 new nations, evidence that respect for a people's right to self-determination has become an international norm.
Cao Changqing is a writer based in the US.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
RSS