After President Chen Shui-bian (
Are Taiwan-US relations really so fragile that the US would abolish the TRA because of a simple spat over Chen's transit? If they were, the two would have severed relations long ago -- for example, when the public attacked the US embassy in Taiwan after a US military court ruled in 1957 that a US official was not guilty of killing Taiwanese Major Liu Tzu-jan (劉自然). If relations were that fragile, the US-Taiwan Mutual Defense Treaty would have been abolished when Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) refused to withdraw from the UN Security Council, as the US suggested, during the battle over Taiwan's UN seat in 1972 -- times when tensions between Taiwan and the US were much worse. But the US did not give up on Chiang after the attacks, nor did it abolish the defense treaty after Taiwan's UN refusal. Obviously, a practical side exists to international relations. But what really affects state-to-state relations are national interests and international forces.
In 1972, the US suggested that Taiwan re-enter the UN because the number of countries recognizing the People's Republic of China government as the rightful representative of China had increased and the US was therefore unable to stop its entry into the UN. China was politically strong enough to force the US to bend. Therefore, the US made the suggestion to ensure Taiwan's and its own interests. Also, it decided to establish ties with Beijing in 1979 because China's international influence had rapidly expanded after it replaced Taiwan in the UN, forcing Washington to withdraw from Taiwan diplomatically. Since China's military and economic power was still insignificant at that time, the US passed the TRA in April of that year without too much Chinese opposition. Thus, both national interests and international forces are crucial to Taiwan-US relations.
Unfortunately, the situation later changed, as many Taiwanese businesspeople moved to China in the 1990s, disregarding international sanctions on China following the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989. China's economic strength has grown ever since, and its military strength has also expanded. As a result, national interests and international forces have gradually leaned toward China. Taiwan's productive investment in China has exceeded US$280 billion since the Tiananmen incident. Although China is the world's second-largest trading power today, with total trade estimated at US$1.4221 trillion last year, about half of its top 20 exporters are Taiwanese companies. The value of its information hardware production is also the world's second largest. But in 2004, as much as 79 percent of these products were manufactured by Taiwanese companies in China.
But money can achieve anything. China is not only expanding its economic interests into the US, but also building its dominance in Southeast Asia. The difficulties of Chen's transit were a direct result of China's economic and military expansion.
Hence, I would like to advise those Taiwanese lawmakers who warn that the US may abolish the TRA that if you are really worried about Taiwan's future, you should stop pushing proposals in the Legislative Yuan that promote cross-strait economic integration and trade.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with