For centuries Christopher Columbus was celebrated for "discovering" the New World. But in recent decades revisionist historians and activists for the rights of indigenous people have been more and more successful in recasting this view.
According to them Columbus is more villain than hero -- a man who did not discover the new world but rather planted the seeds of its destruction.
Some facts are clearly beyond controversy. Columbus, who was born in 1451 and died on May 20, 1506, was an explorer and trader, who crossed the Atlantic Ocean and reached the Americas on Oct. 12, 1492.
Today, he is no longer credited with being the first one to discover the "New World."
At least one group of Europeans had already reached America -- Viking mariners are believed to have established a colony in Newfoundland at around 1000. Some historians also claim that African traders had managed to cross the Atlantic centuries before Columbus.
But once on the shores of the new world, Columbus unleashed a devastating series of economic catastrophes and health disasters that condemned the indigenous populations to hundreds of years of suffering.
Columbus himself plundered large amounts of gold and took slaves back to Spain. But it was the explorers, traders and conquistadors who followed in his footsteps that wrought the real holocaust.
They subjugated the natives with superior technology, plundered all their wealth and brought with them smallpox and other diseases which decimated the population.
By some estimates there were 100 million people living in the Americas when Columbus first landed in 1492 -- a third more than that of Europe at the time. A century later an estimated 90 percent of the population had been eradicated.
For centuries there was little recognition of this injustice. Controversy gained pace, however, in the run-up to the 1992 celebrations of the 500th anniversary of Columbus' landing on Hispaniola. Ridley Scott's movie 1492: Conquest of Paradise contributed to the popular debate.
The US National Council of Churches also announced it was a time not for celebration but for "repentance" over a great historical crime.
"Columbus has become a symbol for the European domination of the Americas," says social historian Eduardo Rojaz. "For radical Hispanics in the US it symbolizes what they see as Anglo-racism."
In this context, the indigenous rights group the Mexica movement, which "supports a total end to European domination of our continent" is also a strong supporter of the rights of undocumented immigrants into the US.
After centuries of this perceived "domination," indigenous peoples and Hispanics seem to have demographics on their side now. A new study in the US pegs the number of Hispanics at over 42 million, making them the largest minority in the country.
According to many demographers the high Hispanic rate of birth and immigration could make them the largest population group in the US within 100 years.
"Latinos ... are the wave of the future," demographer William Frey, told the Washington Post.
Indigenous people account for an estimated 56 percent to 70 percent of the total populations in Bolivia and nearly half of the populations in Guatemala and Peru.
In Venezuela, populist President Hugo Chavez has ridden to power with the support of indigenous people and he continues to use their position to express his country's fierce independence from the US.
Since the 1920s, Columbus Day has traditionally been celebrated as "Dia de la Raza" (Day of the Race) throughout Latin America, in commeration of the first encounters of Europe and the Americas, which would produce the new Mestizo race, culture and identity.
In October 2002, Chavez renamed the occasion "Day of Indian Resistance," and in 2003 demonstrators marked the occasion by toppling a statue of the 15th century explorer in downtown Caracas.
"Christopher Columbus was the spearhead of the biggest invasion and genocide ever seen in the history of humanity," Chavez told representatives of Indian peoples in 2004. "We Venezuelans, we Latin Americans, have no reason to honor Columbus."
However, writer Stephan Thernstrom believes that demonizing Columbus is both unfair to the man himself and blurring the historical importance of the events that his voyages set in motion.
"The arrival of Christopher Columbus in the Western Hemisphere was a pivotal event in the making of the modern world," he said. "It did not usher in a utopia, but neither did it destroy a paradise. The process it set in motion, for all of its ambiguities, was a step forward for mankind."
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with