Due to deliberation over President Chen Shui-bian's (
Some pan-blue politicians and media outlets, however, have rejoiced in this diplomatic failure and made sarcastic comments to humiliate Chen. These people care nothing for Taiwan's dignity or the feelings of the nation's 23 million citizens. Their cooperation with China in its attempts to suppress Taiwan internationally makes us wonder whether or not they have any conscience at all.
The fact that Chen did not transit in the US must be seen as a step back for US-Taiwan relations. The nation's diplomats must take responsibility for their inability to negotiate and blunt the impact on Taiwan's diplomatic space. The US, however, needs China's cooperation in dealing with the Iran nuclear crisis, Sudan and North Korea, and thus does not want Taiwan to "rock the boat," possibly inciting a dispute between the Washington and Beijing at this critical juncture. Taiwan will have to forgive the US for the limits imposed on our friendship by international considerations.
The decision to bypass the US, then, is simply a pragmatic and intelligent way to minimize problems for Taiwan's most important ally. We must, however, remind the US that although China likes to talk about a "peaceful rise," the country's saber rattling, expanding arsenal and despotic treatment of its own citizens is casting a shadow over world peace and stability.
The US should deal with this by offering more support to Taiwan -- another democratic country -- and strengthening the US-Japan security alliance. This is the only way to maintain regional peace. Giving in too much to China's threats is the same as letting the fox into the henhouse, and it will lead to disaster.
The main reason for Chen's humiliation is that China is doing its utmost to suppress Taiwan internationally. Every Taiwanese, regardless of their political views, should treat China as an enemy and condemn its brutish behavior. It is shameful to see how some pan-blue camp politicians and media outlets refuse to abandon their personal antipathy toward Chen when dealing with issues of national interest and dignity. Instead, they laugh at Chen's situation on the airwaves and in the Legislative Yuan and even demanding that he apologize to the public.
These people forget that it is China's suppression of Taiwan that is responsible for the nation's weak international position, and that China is the aggressor and Taiwan the victim. What kind of logic is it that dictates that the victim should apologize after being violated by an aggressor? There is, in fact, nothing wrong with these people, it's just that they don't recognize or identify with Taiwan. They live in Taiwan but have no feelings for the place, and this is the reason for their strange behavior.
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (
Premier Su Tseng-chang (
In 1994, while still president, Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) once lamented "the tragedy of being born Taiwanese." The fact is that the tragedy of being Taiwanese originates with China: Taiwan's earlier lack of democracy was the result of oppression by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and Taiwan's independence and sovereignty is now being threatened by China. Taiwan's democratization process rid us of a dictator that came here from China, and it has allowed the Taiwanese people to live in a land of freedom and democracy.
But, Taiwan's localization movement is still plagued by the nightmare of Chinese threats, and Chen's stopover in the US was clearly blocked because of China's underhanded dealings. Most people in Taiwan are, however, quite clear on the motives of those pan-blue politicians standing on the sidelines laughing, making irresponsible statements and agreeing with everything China says and does.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with