Due to former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan's (
First, the KMT has no defense against China. The forum's five major themes -- economy and trade, direct transportation links, tourism, agriculture and finance -- all echo Beijing's needs, purposely creating a favorable atmosphere for the complete opening of investments in China.
The party ignores that such actions will increase China's attraction, leading to the rapid marginalization of Taiwan's economy. Not to mention that Hu Angang (胡安綱), a member of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, recently stated that since Taiwan's economy is greatly dependent on China, Beijing can impose economic sanctions on Taiwan at any time it chooses. With the enemy's threat still ringing in our ears, the KMT still fails to prepare its defenses.
Second, the KMT has not analyzed the current business situation. The party claimed it was hosting the forum to find a way out for Taiwan's economy, to "boost the economy, save the poor," implying that China is the solution to Taiwan's economic downturn.
But statistics show that Taiwanese business investments in China have exceeded 50 percent of GDP, which is higher than that of Japan (0.6 percent), South Korea (2 percent), and the US (0.3 percent). These investments also account for half of total foreign investment in China. Anyone who can think is able to see that excessive Taiwanese investment in China is the culprit behind industrial and capital outflows. China is not a way out for Taiwan, but a dead end.
Third, the KMT is not taking a critical view of China. The party often boycotts the government and talks about the demise of Taiwan, but it praises China without reviewing actual conditions there. In the pursuit of economic growth, China has deprived laborers of their basic rights and oppressed justice, causing serious confrontations. The KMT pays no attention to this. Even the Beijing newspaper the China Youth Daily dared to report the truth: More than 70 percent of China's wealth (about US$960 billion) is in the hands of less than 0.02 percent of its population (about 230,000 people), illustrating the gap between rich and poor.
Fourth, the KMT is irresponsible. The party is blind to China's crises, while bragging about its prosperity. It hides its Sinicization behind the excuse of globalization and promotes investing in China. It even accuses Taiwan of isolating itself from the world behind the "no haste, be patient" policy.
However, excessive investments in China are precisely the cause of Taiwan's economic downturn, insufficient domestic investment and the fall in consumption and wealth, not to mention the economic criminals who invest money in China and abandon their debts in Taiwan. Such investments create wealth in China while causing suffering to the people of Taiwan. They indirectly help China achieve its goal of invading Taiwan. The KMT has failed to fulfill its responsibilities toward Taiwan.
Fifth, the KMT lacks backbone. It loses all its integrity whenever it meets China. In Taiwan, its members vow to uphold the Republic of China (ROC), but whenever they meet Chinese officials, they remain silent, as if they had never pledged allegiance to the ROC's national flag.
They only dare to undertake their irrational obstruction of the arms procurement plan, paralyzing Taiwan's national defenses, but say nothing about the 800 ballistic missiles China has aimed at this country and dare not demand that Beijing dismantle them. They talk about Taiwan in satirical tones, but their tongues become sweet and gentle when speaking about China. How can we expect this spineless party to "have its own interpretation" once Taiwan really accepts the "one China" principle?
The KMT-CCP forum is a farce. We in the four Taiwan societies want to remind the public to face China's attempts to divide Taiwan and its "united front" strategy, which is aimed at confusing the international community. As for the Executive Yuan's planned conference on the sustainable development of Taiwan's economy, the four societies also want to remind the government that the solution to the nation's economic problems lies in improving the domestic investment environment, developing a knowledge-based economy and the upgrading its industry.
As an island state, Taiwan can find business opportunities all over the world. It must not isolate itself in China. From a political or economic perspective, the opening of direct flights and transportation links at this stage is tantamount to digging our own grave. Those in power must think twice before they act.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
RSS