In reply to Alun Arnold (Letters, March 29, page 8) about applying for a Permanent Alien Resident Certificate (PARC), please allow me to give some tips and advice, as I recently received mine.
It is true that assembling several time-sensitive documents simultaneously is a trick, I agree. Hence, getting the PARC takes some determination and people skills.
First, in applying for a criminal records check, he needed to provide a former permanent UK address, because it is apparent that, unlike Canada, the UK does not have a central crime computer system, so the British police need to start somewhere. Or maybe Taiwan should allow in terrorists or serial killers without any attempt at checking their background? The five-year period [for a clean record] Arnold mentions is incorrect.
Arnold objects to the health check which every certificate applicant is required to take. Well, sir, we don't care who you have been sleeping with or if you have never seen a doctor in your life, but it's reasonable that you prove that you don't have TB or AIDS right now. Remember, if you get your PARC, you won't have to do it again.
As far as using your current ARC as proof of your current residence, that is reasonable and this happened in my case. I found officials very creative in solving difficult obstacles in this somewhat irksome process, as long as they were dealing with someone who demonstrated politeness and patience.
It is apparent that you have not learned much about that in your seven years in this eminently reasonable country.
So good luck, you will need a lot.
John Hanna
Taoyuan
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with