My name is Eric Lier and I am an American in Taiwan. My family first began manufacturing shoes here in 1980, and three generations of my family have been living here as temporary residents since that time. I am writing as one who is becoming very concerned about events relating to all Americans who live in Taiwan.
A group of US congressmen recently introduced legislation sponsored by representatives Robert Andrews and Ed Royce urging US President George W. Bush to give preference to Taiwan when considering potential free-trade agreements.
Free trade is one of the US' most effective tools for promoting democracy and human rights, and a free trade agreement with Taiwan would have great benefits for both sides.
What many in Taiwan and the US fail to recognize publicly is that human rights in Taiwan have stalled for well over half a million inhabitants, including Americans like my family, who do not hold citizenship. All too often legal immigrants and migrants face strong government-mandated discrimination as well as human and civil rights abuses at the hands of the Taiwanese government.
A free-trade agreement between the US and Taiwan would provide recognition of Taiwan's status as a free and democratic nation and would further enhance Taiwan's democracy. However, there is still vast room for progress in this country's respect for human rights, as well as the few civil rights that are legislated but often ignored for over a half million non-Republic of China (ROC) citizens legally residing in Taiwan. Equally important should be the interest of Americans in terms of reciprocation of rights, freedom and market access in Taiwan when negotiating preferential free-trade agreements.
The current status of Americans in Taiwan continues to be out of balance with that of ROC citizens in the US. The policy of refusing permanent residency and denying rights to Americans in Taiwan has been the official policy of the Taiwanese governing authority for the past 50 years, and must be rectified.
Many of us in Taiwan are pleading with the US Congress in urging US President George W. Bush to support not just Taiwanese or US corporations when negotiating free trade but also American citizens and the ever-growing number of legal immigrants and migrants who continue to suffer here.
Eric Lier
Taichung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with