At first glance, the idea of making phone calls via the Internet seems like adding a layer of complication to something that has been perfectly simple to do for decades.
Unbeknown to us, many phone companies as well as corporate phone customers often use the Internet to transmit our voices already, and the technology is moving so fast that it is fair to say it is growing by the week.
The buzz word is VoIP, meaning "Voice over Internet Protocol" and pronounced vee-oh-eye-pee. It is likely to be all over the CeBIT electronics trade fair beginning in Germany on Thursday and running till March 15.
VoIP has been making major headway in places where access to the phone system is metered by the minute, but access to the Internet is paid for by the month at a so-called flat rate, meaning the customer can use as much of the Internet as they like.
It's easy to see why this makes phone calls via the Internet attractive, especially if you make a lot of international calls.
Since you are paying the flat rate anyway, the VoIP calls are effectively free.
Internet telephony has been around for a few years, but it had a rocky start because the early connections were terrible. Sometimes they sounded fine, but often the sound was distorted, only snatches came through or the connection would crash completely.
A bold Internet start-up called Skype changed all that. Millions of people have signed up for free accounts with Skype and are chatting over its lines. All you need is a computer and a headset that contains headphones and a microphone.
The rest of the wave has come with VoIP phones, which look like conventional phones but are sold by Internet service providers.
You don't need to have your computer switched on: These new-fangled phones take care of it all, sending the signals through broadband connections such as DSL or the TV cable, and the customer pays just a single Internet fee.
Just how far VoIP has come is hard to judge, especially since many of us may not even realize that calls at the office, for example, are being routed via the Internet.
The call quality today is generally as good as with mobile phones, though an echo on the line or an unusually long delay when another person replies to what you say are clues that an Internet connection is in use.
"The delay can be quite annoying because you keep interrupting one another and starting to talk again," says Jochen Noelle, a German who operates a Web site devoted to the topic, VoIP-Info.de. Noelle says you soon get used to it.
The main losers are traditional telephone companies that have earned a living by charging for phone use by the minute.
The British business magazine the Economist recently had a cover story showing a desert with a bleak line of broken telephone polls and the line, "How the Internet broke the phone business."
For corporate customers, a major attraction is that phone and Internet services do not have to be purchased separately. Most businesses already have the personal computers in place. With one mouse click, staff can place phone calls.
Germany is now moving to the next big thing: Individuals can obtain a single "phone number" that will be the destination for all calls whether they are at home or using a mobile, for faxes and for e-mails.
The service in Germany is code-named ENUM, which stands for Eine Nummer (the one number).
It's not hard to imagine the downside. If you are already frustrated by all the spam in your inbox, imagine how you are going to feel at all the recorded messages that will be played to you over the telephone by callers who will not have to pay a penny.
A word for it has already been invented: spit. (That stands for spam over Internet telephony).
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with