It seems that Henry Ting has trouble with logic ("Coexisting with China necessary," Feb. 17, page 8).
Throughout his article he presents a rational argument for engaging China economically as the rest of the world is doing.
Ting fails either by intent or by lack of logic to use the same argument for Taiwan.
He fails to differentiate between a unified economy (which he grants others are doing) and a country unified under one government -- even if it is despotic -- which he suggests Taiwan do: "The Chen government or its successor should drop the requirement that China must be democratic before unification can happen."
Ting appears to be another Chinese Communist Party tool by taking political and not economic unification as a foregone conclusion for the democracy of Taiwan and by not making distinctions between the two methods.
It is true Taiwan need not antagonize China by overtly stating the obvious, but by the same token, China need not antagonize Taiwan by pointing missiles at it and demanding Taipei submit to its will.
Taiwan can be the engine that propels democratization in China by its example and by showing that the democratic spirit is not inimical to the Chinese culture, as some have suggested.
That is how it is "the key for a permanent solution for all problems in the region," not by submission to preordained talks.
Jerome Keating
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with