It is extremely disconcerting to see Ma Ying-jeou making mixed and oftentimes contradictory statements about the solutions to cross-strait tensions during his "grand tour" of Europe.
What does he mean by saying that the course of peace still needs to be pursued vigorously in spite of the 700 missiles aimed at Taiwan, after first endorsing the idea that there can be no talk of peace until the missiles are removed?
These sort of outpourings put any person with common sense in awe. It is insane sophistry at best. How can any rational being think it's a viable proposition to negotiate peace with a thug brandishing his gun? One has a better chance when playing Russian roulette.
Is this the man who wants to claim the presidency in the year 2008? One shudders to think of the consequences if indeed he gets that far.
We may come to diverse conclusions about this man's contradictory and shifty remarks. But one thing we know for sure is that behind Ma's words, lurks the spirit of a trimmer.
Perhaps this should not be construed as a detestable strategy in view of his eagerness to please everybody. But it is definitely a disaster in the context of Taiwan becoming a truly sovereign nation. How much longer can Taiwan afford to vacillate in the international arena?
Anyone can see that Ma's overseas trip is nothing but an endeavor to generate more publicity to show off to the folks back home. It is not something that the president can do everyday. But, to expect more from Ma would be an insult to one's intelligence. After all, pretty is what pretty does.
Yang Chun-hui
Salt Lake City, Utah
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with