US shouldn't side with China
As a Taiwanese-US grassroots organization promoting freedom and democracy for the people of Taiwan we would like to register our deep concern about a statement reportedly made by a "senior Bush administration official" who is "closely involved in cross-strait affairs."
The official recently gave a briefing to the Chinese-language Liberty Times in which he "emphasized that the two sides of the Strait have continued to avoid direct official dialogue, and that if Taiwan was not willing to make concessions on cross-strait economic policy, and refused to move ahead with direct links with Beijing, it would not be in the best interests of the US" ("US disappointed by cross-strait ties: official," Jan. 8, page 3).
What disturbs us in this statement is that the onus for the lack of dialogue is put on the government in Taiwan. As is well known, President Chen Shui-bian's (
China has continued to impose its unreasonable "one China" condition on Taipei, which basically requires Taiwan to surrender its sovereignty before talks can even start. This is obviously unacceptable.
More disturbingly, the statement implies that it is the US position that Taiwan should make concessions and move toward direct links with China, while no mention is made of any concessions from China or moderation of its stance.
The US is certainly aware of the fact that China is threatening Taiwan with military force, including some 780 missiles.
A step in the right direction would be for China to dismantle the missiles and renounce the use of military force. The Bush administration would do well to focus on those aspects.
As US citizens of Taiwanese descent we believe that the US should avoid siding with China, and should be more supportive of a free and democratic Taiwan.
C.T. Lee
President of the Formosan
Association for Public
Affairs, Washington
Follow up on reserves
In a recent "Quick Take" column there was a short article on changes in the rules for entry to nature reserves ("Rules for nature reserves," Jan. 8, page 3).
It would be great if the paper could follow up on this by providing further information on how and where members of the public can register to enter nature reserves, or even if this is still possible.
Conservation of natural resources is important and the government should be commended for taking further steps to preserve Taiwan's unique biodiversity. I support efforts to tighten entry requirements to nature reserves, but at the same time I hope that if the rules are followed, ordinary people will still be allowed to visit and enjoy these wild areas.
For it is only on land with intact, working ecosystems that one can gain some insight into the complexity, interrelatedness and beauty of nature.
Dan Chamberlin
Taipei
Let the pandas in
Bring the pandas to Taiwan! Sure, they're pretty dull to watch (what can you say about an animal that faces extinction because it can't be bothered to mate?), but the same is true for koalas.
The koalas at the Taipei Zoo might as well be stuffed for all the entertainment value they offer, but all those koala T-shirts, balloons and assorted paraphernalia have kept Taiwan's economy afloat for years. And the pandas bring hope for unemployed local actors as well: Have the pandas regularly guest star on local soap operas and Korean soaps will have to start featuring Bigfoot or something in order to compete. Everybody wins!
Jonathan Brody
Taipei
Local soap operas are vulgar
I am not a fan of Korean soap operas, but I was really surprised by the Government Information Office's (GIO) announcement that it plans to restrict the number of foreign soap operas on prime-time television.
Honestly, I have avoided Taiwanese soap operas for years because I have had enough of their hideous nonsense and weak storylines. I also worry that children will begin to imitate the actors' vulgar language and violent behavior.
Shortly after the GIO's announcement, I heard that some performers and directors have been complaining about how they have suffered as a result of the invasion of foreign soap operas. Unfortunately, these people don't seem to think about why they are unable to compete in the entertainment market.
More than 10 years ago, Taiwan started importing Japanese soap operas. Local viewers loved these programs' solid and short plot lines. Later, Chinese soap operas, too, were shown in Taiwan and people praised the programs for their sophisticated quality.
Currently, Korean soap operas are all the rage as a result of the fact that they are well shot and feature diverse storylines without using drawn-out delay tactics.
Rather than complaining about the threat posed by foreign soap operas, Taiwanese producers should consider how to improve the quality of their programs in order to regain the public's interest.
Lai Shu-Mei
Taichung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with