Recently I have been watching news and political talk shows on local TV. Often I see people calling themselves military experts accusing the Taiwanese government of spending too much money on the military budget. I believe that these so-called "experts" are not even focusing on the real problem. The real problem is "are the weapons suitable for Taiwan?"
I would like to illustrate the problem using a story.
Once upon a time, deep in a forest far far away, the lion was the king of all the animals. One day, there was a competition held in the forest. The lion decided to send out his best team in order to win, so he selected the eagle to compete in the flying marathon, the tiger to join the running race and the shark to participate in the diving competition. However, the results during training were not very satisfactory, and the lion could not figure out why. The lion could not understand why the results were so bad as he had chosen the strongest and most fearsome animals. The fox then told the lion "it's because you have selected the wrong kind of animals. You should let the pigeon compete in the flying, let the horse run in the race, and let the dolphin do the diving." The lion decided to follow the fox's suggestions and the animals were victorious in every event.
According to recent military magazines, the long-stalled arms procurement budget, which includes submarines, anti-sub planes and Patriot III missiles will definitely increase Taiwan's defensive capability. Even though these weapons are not the most lethal, they are the most suitable for Taiwan. I believe that the government should not buy the most destructive weapons in order to compete with China. However we should equip ourselves with advanced weapons in order to protect ourselves.
If the lawmakers think the arms budget is too expensive and the weapons are not suitable, do they have a better list for Taiwan? The opposition party has been rejecting the arms budget for the sake of opposition, but the only way to solve the problem is to start discussing the procurement.
Chiu Yen-Lung
Miaoli
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with