Philosophers and poets have long pondered the importance of friendship: Euripides thought "a loyal friend worth 10,000 relatives," while Ringo got by with a little help from his.
With marriage in terminal decline in many nations, many of us are realizing the value of ours. In the UK for instance, within 25 years half of those aged 45 to 54 will not be married (compared with just over 70 percent who are in a marriage today).
For the increasing number who remain single or childless, friends are the new families -- a trend reflected in TV series such as Friends and Will and Grace.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
But juggling friends and work is not easy. Take my week: Saturday night was spent with neighbors, drinking, eating and gossiping; Sunday I met Dawn, a former colleague from three jobs ago, for lunchtime Bloody Marys; on Monday I was kickboxing with Sally, whom I met on holiday 10 years ago; on Tuesday I went to Guys and Dolls with school-friend Rachel; Wednesday is pub quiz night with a bunch of hacks (we never win); on Thursday I had dinner with old university friends.
By Friday I was exhausted and broke, and spent the evening slumped on the sofa wondering if I had the money, time or stamina to keep up with everyone.
I love my friends and am grateful they've stuck by me all these years. But the older I get, and the more people I befriend, the more difficult it is to keep up with them. And I'm not alone.
As more of us go to university, hop between jobs, move around the country and marry later, we build up large, varied networks. And yet, for all their increasing importance in our lives and the high cost of maintaining friendships, we have no idea of the economic significance of friends. Thanks to economists and sociologists, policy-makers know almost everything there is to know about marriage and the family, and its impact on health and national well-being. Employers, too, can turn to any number of studies about how husbands, wives and children affect workplace performance.
Yet important economic questions about friendship remain unstudied and unanswered. Is there an optimum number of friends? Does having friends affect health and productivity? Is friendship the same for men and women?
Daniel Hamermesh, professor of economics at the University of Texas, suggests that knowing about the distribution of friendships and contacts could alter how we think about the cohesiveness of society. The crucial issue, he suggests, is the value of time.
"I would expect high-wage, long-hours people to have fewer friends, because of the `income effect' [less total time] and the `substitution effect' [what time there is is valuable]. Asking questions about the optimum number of friends, or the value of a network, is a tough question but one that does make sense," he says.
John Ermisch, professor of economics at the Institute for Social and Economic Research at Essex University, England, also believes it worth studying, but is skeptical about whether friends play a more important role now.
"It may be true for younger people, partly because of delaying family-related events such as babies and marriage," he says.
"It's a life cycle thing. By middle age, family are important again, especially if you have children. Things like having a baby reduces the amount of time you see friends regularly. To a lesser extent a partnership does as well. The other thing that happens over a life cycle is that friends are substituted for other friends ... those with children make friends with other mothers," he says.
Ermisch has been looking, as part of a wider study on mobility, at how friendship networks affect people's decision to move house.
"If you have a large and dense friendship network this reduces the chance that you will move more than 30km away. You find that after people have moved, old friendship networks are dropped," he says.
Interestingly, he has found that those who move once are more likely to move again because they have fewer friendship ties.
Ermisch says of friendship: "It's an important part of people's lives and an important source of their welfare. Time and money invested in a friendship network is like that invested in a house, and you reap the benefits over time. As an economist, that's how I think about it."
Proper regard for the economics of friendship could influence all sorts of areas: employers might find that encouraging workplace social clubs increases productivity and makes workers less likely to leave; companies which give priority when allocating Christmas holiday leave to employees with families may realize single people have "families" of friends they are just as close to; and people could be allowed compassionate leave if a best friend was terminally ill.
And friends we've neglected would understand it's not because we don't like them anymore, it's just the income and substitution effect.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with