When President Chen Shui-bian (
It has now become a matter of urgency for the central government to put a stop to the unreasonable increase in public works spending by local governments.
The development of industrial zones is a typical example of how the the national resources have been misused. Under the Ministry of Economic Affairs alone, around 800 hectares of industrial zones across the nation remain vacant, which converts into an investment of NT$30 to NT$40 billion, which has not seen any return. Besides, the occupancy rate of industrial zones under the National Science Council is just 50 percent.
Over the past few years, the transformation of the nation's industrial structure, Taiwan's economic slump, and changes in the domestic and international commercial structure of other countries have challenged the development of the nation's industrial zones.
In the past, industrial zones developed by the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB) had been competitive and profitable as the price of the land used by industrial parks across the nation was only one-third or two-thirds of the market price.
However, the stagnant economic growth of the nation has made it difficult for the government to sell off these industrial zones, either through state-run or private enterprises. The compounding of interest on these properties has pushed prices up even further, so that land in industrial zones is no longer competitive with other areas.
The root of the problem lies with the provisions of government investment incentive programs and the Statute for Upgrading Industries (
On the technological and economic front, California's Silicon Valley is much stronger than Taiwan. Major chip-makers and optoelectronic component manufacturers are in the north of Silicon Valley and biotech companies are in the south. Using land for multiple purposes is becoming the mainstream idea, and each county or region can also have a distinctive industry. Clearly, this is something the government can learn from the US.
According to statistics, there are currently nearly 2,500 hectares of land that the government has approved or is in the process of approving for use as industrial zones. If we add the land already available for these purposes, there is sufficient land designated for industrial zones to meet the needs of the next five years. Quantity is clearly not a problem and we should now focus on quality.
Local governments should take careful account and plan for the future, rather than rushing ahead and then looking for support from the central government further down the track. The government should first seek to draw up an effective and comprehensive plan regarding public works projects, such as industrial zones, airports and harbors. It shouldn't give local governments a free hand to use such projects to pay/settle political debts, in total disregard for the needs of the market, for such political interference will ultimately harm the nation's economic development.
Andrew Huang is the director of the National Volunteer Association.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS