Everyone knows that the basic principle of capitalism is profit maximization and cost minimization.
This is why entrepreneurs do everything in their ability to reduce their costs, and "cost down" has become a business mantra.
It has become the law of the marketplace.
But from a social perspective, when individuals push this principle to an extreme, the result is an increase in overall costs to society.
This is especially the case in minimizing labor costs, which is often achieved at the cost of the rights of workers.
Many social developments over the last century have been aimed at limiting the extent to which labor can be exploited by employers in their pursuit of cost minimization.
As a developed, democratic nation, we expect the government to understand the critical importance of such social developments.
But recent riots by Thai laborers working on the Kaohsiung MRT reveal that when government indifference gives employers a free rein, there is nothing they will not do to minimize costs.
Over the last dozen or so years, Taiwan has experienced economic development that has taken society through a process of development that took centuries in the West.
With official approval, businesspeople have brought in foreign labor on a massive scale, making them work in harsh conditions.
At the same time, they have used factory closures to push their costs onto unemployed workers, and then cooperated with Chinese authorities to exploit cheap labor in China. This is all done in the name of reducing costs. But even as they push down production costs, they also oppress workers rights.
To take a longer view, if Taiwan wants to hold its head up in the international community, it will require more than consciousness of a national identity.
The nation's commitment to universal values must also be acknowledged. Our commitment to democracy and human rights is one of our most valuable commodities, and the scandal of the MRT's Thai workers has virtually destroyed the good impression we have made by revealing a tattered labor rights record behind the glossy image we sought to present to the world.
They see that we oppress workers to feed greedy capitalists and corrupt officials.
By taking cost minimization to an extreme, businesspeople have created social upheaval that undermines our democracy.
In this situation, what kind of democracy can we bring to the world? How can we have the confidence to declare that we are a society built on human rights?
After the transfer of political power in 2000, many thought that the culmination of Taiwan's democracy had been achieved.
Having witnessed the riot among the Kaohsiung MRT's Thai workers, we should realize that we have reached a bottleneck in democratic reform, and that democratic values have not permeated down into industry or society in general.
If we do not break through this bottleneck and instead allow unrestrained cost-cutting, then Taiwan's democratic achievements over the past 20 years will be obliterated by the anger of its working class.
There are some costs that we should pay. Only in this way can we stand firm on a foundation of universal values. This is not something that is open to cost minimization.
Chung Kung-choa is president of the Taiwan Confederation of Trade Unions.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with