The turbidity of the water in the Shihmen Reservoir (
The recent water supply problem in Taoyuan County came in the wake of Typhoon Matsa on Aug. 5, and it was a recurrence of the problems caused by Typhoon Mindulle last July.
Also, flash floods bringing turbid water into the Touchien River (
By the same token, certain cities and counties in the south, such as Kaohsiung and Pingtung, are facing similar problems. But the public has a short memory for such problems.
After a prolonged drought last month and this one, southern Taiwan was looking forward to rain showers to relieve the drought.
Unfortunately, what came after were the devastations of the June 12 flooding and Typhoon Haitang on July 18.
The turbidity of water in the Kaoping River (
The turbidity of the off-stream Nanhua Reservoir (
Despite the Taiwan Water Corp's (TWC) all-out efforts to restore the water supply at an early date, hundreds of residents in Kaohsiung City's Tsuiping Borough recently had their water cut off for as long as seven days.
TWC officials have already announced that water shortages will be a recurring problem in Taoyuan because of a high water turbidity level resulting from typhoons and torrential rains.
The Pingting Water Treatment Plant (
It was found that the silt content was between 45,360 tonnes to 90,718 tonnes a day, accounting for one-fifth of the total volume.
How could such turbid water be used? Would building more sedimentation tanks be of any help?
About 80 years ago during the Japanese period, a Japanese engineer used hydraulic engineering techniques to construct the Erfeng Ditch (
The thinking behind the construction of the ditch in the region originated from the recurring flooding and drought problems in areas near the Taiwan Sugar Corp's Wanlung Farm (
The Erfeng Ditch, an underground water intake structure, was built at the headwater of the Linpien River, which is currently located 100m upstream of the Laiyi Bridge (
The construction of the Erfeng Ditch was completed within two years, and its water intake structures include four different parts: trapezoid water diversion weirs, semi-circle underground watersheds, arched channels, and water-gathering towers.
The complex constructions cannot be seen above ground since they are under the riverbed.
During the first decade after the completion of the Erfeng Ditch, the water supply was as much as 228,610 tonnes during the rainy season.
Although the ditch was partially damaged, its water supply can still reach 74,390 tonnes per day, an amount higher than the Ahgungtien Reservoir (
Basically, the Erfeng Ditch is an underground water diversion weir under the riverbed.
Since surface water goes through permeable sand and gravel as a natural filtration process, even during periods of heavy rainfalls or typhoons causing high water turbidity, the Erfeng Ditch can still have supply clear water.
Faced with the long-term failure to reduce the turbidity of the water supply during periods of heavy rainfall, the government should reflect on the reason why even after a large expenditure of money on large-scale hydraulic engineering projects, such as constructions of dams and water diversion weirs, the water shortages remain a recurring problem.
There are two other possibilities to help gather clean water: building the Kaotai Reservoir (
But would these two projects simply be high-investment projects that yield low returns?
My purpose in this article is not to praise the successful hydraulic techniques used in constructing the Erfeng Ditch.
Instead, I want to use the Erfeng Ditch as a reminder that if the water turbidity problems after heavy rain continue, the government's stubborn belief in the construction of weirs and dams should be discarded.
Instead, the government should find a way for effective water resource management that can truly benefit the nation.
Also, it would probably be a way to stop future water stoppages during the rainy season.
Lee Ken-cheng is the chief of the Kaohsiung Teachers Association's Ecological Education Center.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase