The turbidity of the water in the Shihmen Reservoir (
The recent water supply problem in Taoyuan County came in the wake of Typhoon Matsa on Aug. 5, and it was a recurrence of the problems caused by Typhoon Mindulle last July.
Also, flash floods bringing turbid water into the Touchien River (
By the same token, certain cities and counties in the south, such as Kaohsiung and Pingtung, are facing similar problems. But the public has a short memory for such problems.
After a prolonged drought last month and this one, southern Taiwan was looking forward to rain showers to relieve the drought.
Unfortunately, what came after were the devastations of the June 12 flooding and Typhoon Haitang on July 18.
The turbidity of water in the Kaoping River (
The turbidity of the off-stream Nanhua Reservoir (
Despite the Taiwan Water Corp's (TWC) all-out efforts to restore the water supply at an early date, hundreds of residents in Kaohsiung City's Tsuiping Borough recently had their water cut off for as long as seven days.
TWC officials have already announced that water shortages will be a recurring problem in Taoyuan because of a high water turbidity level resulting from typhoons and torrential rains.
The Pingting Water Treatment Plant (
It was found that the silt content was between 45,360 tonnes to 90,718 tonnes a day, accounting for one-fifth of the total volume.
How could such turbid water be used? Would building more sedimentation tanks be of any help?
About 80 years ago during the Japanese period, a Japanese engineer used hydraulic engineering techniques to construct the Erfeng Ditch (
The thinking behind the construction of the ditch in the region originated from the recurring flooding and drought problems in areas near the Taiwan Sugar Corp's Wanlung Farm (
The Erfeng Ditch, an underground water intake structure, was built at the headwater of the Linpien River, which is currently located 100m upstream of the Laiyi Bridge (
The construction of the Erfeng Ditch was completed within two years, and its water intake structures include four different parts: trapezoid water diversion weirs, semi-circle underground watersheds, arched channels, and water-gathering towers.
The complex constructions cannot be seen above ground since they are under the riverbed.
During the first decade after the completion of the Erfeng Ditch, the water supply was as much as 228,610 tonnes during the rainy season.
Although the ditch was partially damaged, its water supply can still reach 74,390 tonnes per day, an amount higher than the Ahgungtien Reservoir (
Basically, the Erfeng Ditch is an underground water diversion weir under the riverbed.
Since surface water goes through permeable sand and gravel as a natural filtration process, even during periods of heavy rainfalls or typhoons causing high water turbidity, the Erfeng Ditch can still have supply clear water.
Faced with the long-term failure to reduce the turbidity of the water supply during periods of heavy rainfall, the government should reflect on the reason why even after a large expenditure of money on large-scale hydraulic engineering projects, such as constructions of dams and water diversion weirs, the water shortages remain a recurring problem.
There are two other possibilities to help gather clean water: building the Kaotai Reservoir (
But would these two projects simply be high-investment projects that yield low returns?
My purpose in this article is not to praise the successful hydraulic techniques used in constructing the Erfeng Ditch.
Instead, I want to use the Erfeng Ditch as a reminder that if the water turbidity problems after heavy rain continue, the government's stubborn belief in the construction of weirs and dams should be discarded.
Instead, the government should find a way for effective water resource management that can truly benefit the nation.
Also, it would probably be a way to stop future water stoppages during the rainy season.
Lee Ken-cheng is the chief of the Kaohsiung Teachers Association's Ecological Education Center.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS