Washington's decision to reopen access for India to civil nuclear technology is another example of the Bush administration's engagement of the South Asian nation as a counterweight to China, Indian analysts said on Tuesday.
"People have it in their minds that in Asia it should not be a wholly China-dominated scene," Indian former foreign secretary Salman Haider said.
"Japan has become more assertive and we are seen as a potential counterbalance. Whether it should take the form of rivalry with China, that's a separate question. I think the United States would like to bring us into play [vis-a-vis China]," he said.
China and India are the world's fastest-growing economies. While China is an established Asian giant, India, with its 7 percent growth rate last year, is seen as an emerging power.
But for India the issue of energy is becoming more and more important as it attempts to power the needs of its billion-plus population and fuel its booming economy.
US President George W. Bush said after a summit with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in Washington on Monday that he would ask the US Congress and allied nations to lift sanctions preventing Indian access to civil nuclear technology.
Washington had imposed sanctions on India after its second round of nuclear tests in May 1998, but agreed after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to waive those and other sanctions in return for support in the "war on terrorism."
However, as India is not party to the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, it is precluded under US law from receiving technology that could aid its nuclear program.
But Bush said he would "seek agreement from Congress to adjust US laws and policies" and work with "friends and allies to adjust international regimes" for such cooperation and trade with India.
"I think this agreement to reopen civil nuclear technology is perhaps the most significant aspect of what transpired in Washington," said the former Indian ambassador to the US, Pakistan Parthasarthy.
"The United States was claiming that it wanted India to be a partner and yet had imposed sanctions on India on nuclear space and high-technology transfers that were far more stringent than on China," he said. "So any kind of partnership was meaningless unless these were removed. It's the first step in that direction ... Full credit to President Bush. He is the friendliest president India has had in the White House."
Parthasarthy said the developments should be viewed in the context of "the emerging Asian balance of power [in which] the United States sees India as a partner."
Last month the countries signed a 10-year defense agreement paving the way for joint weapons production, cooperation on missile defense and a possible lifting of US export controls for sensitive military technologies.
Earlier this year, Washington offered sophisticated F-16 fighter jets to India, following up on its declaration that it would like to help India become a major power in the 21st century.
US Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns, while briefing reporters on the Bush-Singh talks, described the Indian prime minister's trip as "one of the most important visits of this year."
"We consider India to be one of our most important partners worldwide ... We've never had a relationship in nearly 60 years with India like the one we have now established," he added, according to a release by the US embassy in New Delhi.
Traditionally close to the erstwhile Soviet Union, India adopted a non-aligned position during the Cold War. It has long-established firm ties with Russia, which feed 70 percent of its defense needs.
However, with the opening up of the Indian economy in the early 1990s, ties with the US also started warming up, getting a major fillip when former US president Bill Clinton visited India in 2000.
Bush is slated to visit India within the next year.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with