One thing that is so fascinating about Chinese history is the frequent mass denial of the blatantly obvious, of the willingness of politicians and citizens to ignore what is staring them in the face. During the reign of Mao Zedong (毛澤東), farmers, under pressure to meet impossible production targets, simply lied, claiming to have raised pigs the size of trucks -- and presented papier-mache models as "proof".
Of course, everyone knew that everyone else was lying, but no one could come out and state the simple truth. The same is true with the situation between Taiwan and China. China repeats with a straight face that Taiwan is not a country. And other countries in the world, who should know better, accept the lie willingly. They, too, know that China is lying, but are afraid to speak the truth.
So, we avoid the obvious by engaging in endless discussions about this treaty and that communique, the difference between "acknowledge" and "recognize," and the "Three Noes," the "Eight Nevers" and the "Seventeen Maybes." Taiwan is never mentioned by name, and we end up with something called "Chinese Taipei" participating in the Olympics, the "Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu" representing Taiwan in the World Trade Organization and the "Kwang Hwa Information and Culture Center" or Taiwan's embassy in Hong Kong.
But it's all irrelevant, as Dennis Hickey pointed out in his wonderfully refreshing letter (June 29, page 8). Taiwan is sovereign -- as he makes abundantly clear. We can argue about whether it should be in the future, or whether it was in the past, but there is no question -- absolutely none -- about its current status. So the next time I feel myself sinking into a sophistry-induced stupor as people discuss the exact relationship between Taiwan and China (State to state? Special state to state? Two sides on either side of the Taiwan Strait?), I'll remember Hickey's words, and be restored to consciousness and clarity.
Brian Schack
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with