One thing that is so fascinating about Chinese history is the frequent mass denial of the blatantly obvious, of the willingness of politicians and citizens to ignore what is staring them in the face. During the reign of Mao Zedong (毛澤東), farmers, under pressure to meet impossible production targets, simply lied, claiming to have raised pigs the size of trucks -- and presented papier-mache models as "proof".
Of course, everyone knew that everyone else was lying, but no one could come out and state the simple truth. The same is true with the situation between Taiwan and China. China repeats with a straight face that Taiwan is not a country. And other countries in the world, who should know better, accept the lie willingly. They, too, know that China is lying, but are afraid to speak the truth.
So, we avoid the obvious by engaging in endless discussions about this treaty and that communique, the difference between "acknowledge" and "recognize," and the "Three Noes," the "Eight Nevers" and the "Seventeen Maybes." Taiwan is never mentioned by name, and we end up with something called "Chinese Taipei" participating in the Olympics, the "Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu" representing Taiwan in the World Trade Organization and the "Kwang Hwa Information and Culture Center" or Taiwan's embassy in Hong Kong.
But it's all irrelevant, as Dennis Hickey pointed out in his wonderfully refreshing letter (June 29, page 8). Taiwan is sovereign -- as he makes abundantly clear. We can argue about whether it should be in the future, or whether it was in the past, but there is no question -- absolutely none -- about its current status. So the next time I feel myself sinking into a sophistry-induced stupor as people discuss the exact relationship between Taiwan and China (State to state? Special state to state? Two sides on either side of the Taiwan Strait?), I'll remember Hickey's words, and be restored to consciousness and clarity.
Brian Schack
Taipei
Communist China’s Global Times warned US President Joe Biden in the first week of this month that he “should make a significant response to China’s sincerity within his first 100 days, as the sincerity and patience will not last forever.” In fact, they lasted only days. By the end of the week, Beijing had laid down the law, so to speak, to the Biden administration. First was a speech billed as a “Dialogue with National Committee on US-China Relations,” by Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪), director of China’s Office of the Central Commission for Foreign Affairs. Yang said he was pleased “to have
Three years ago, former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Yeh Yi-jin (葉宜津) raised quite a few eyebrows when she proposed abolishing Taiwan’s zhuyin fuhao (注音符號, Mandarin phonetic symbols commonly known as “Bopomofo”) system in her bid to become Tainan mayor. Yeh did not make it onto the ballot, and it was not clear how she would have begun to implement such a gargantuan change locally. Not only is Bopomofo learned by all schoolchildren in Taiwan, it is the most popular system for typing Chinese in the nation, despite being considered one of the least efficient input methods. Bopomofo has also become
The Canadian parliament on Monday passed a motion saying that China’s human rights abuses against the country’s Uighur Muslim population in Xinjiang constitute “genocide.” Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has so far avoided using the word genocide in regard to Xinjiang, but if he did, it would begin to generate solidarity among G7 nations on the issue — which is something Trudeau has called for. Former US president Donald Trump used the word genocide regarding Xinjiang before leaving office last month, and members of US President Joe Biden’s administration have been pushing for him to make the same declaration, a Reuters report
When Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) wakes up one morning and decides that his People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can win a war to conquer Taiwan, that is when his war will begin. To ensure that Xi never gains that confidence it is now necessary for the United States to shed any notions of “forbearance” in arms sales to Taiwan. Largely because they could guarantee military superiority on the Taiwan Strait, US administrations from Jimmy Carter to Barack Obama practiced “forbearance” — pre-emptive limitation of arms sales to Taiwan — in hopes of gaining diplomatic leverage with Beijing. President Ronald
RSS