The Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) chairmanship election could have been a watershed leading to change and party reform. Regardless of who wins, positive competition and media information would have given the public the impression that the party has changed during its eight years in opposition. It would have both improved the party's image and increased its chances in the year-end mayoral and county commissioner elections.
The reform that was supposed to be the result of the chairmanship election, however, has turned into a drawn-out failure. First, there was the central standing committee's signature drive, and then party members kneeling to implore Chairman Lien Chan (
Taiwan has been democratic for many years, but there are still KMT members that like to play old imperial games.
Will democratic competition within the party tear the KMT apart? Maybe, because such is the temporary pain of reform. Over the long term, however, it will be beneficial to the formation of a superior democratic culture. Look at American democracy, and the Democratic and Republican parties. In the party preliminaries held prior to the presidential election every four years, slander and personal attacks abound. When the results are out, however, the earlier vitriol is abandoned and each party unites.
Both of the KMT's previous two splits have taken place under a patriarchal system. If this chairmanship election abandons democratic procedure for patriarchal leadership, it will be tantamount to democratic regression and will alienate the public.
If Lien stays on to "consolidate the party leadership" as his supporters claim, the competition for the party's presidential candidacy will merely be postponed.
What's more, if Lien wants to stay on, why did he risk being called a communist sympathizer for undertaking his "peace tour" to China at such a sensitive moment, when Beijing had just passed its "Anti-Secession" Law? Turning it around, would stepping aside improve Lien's historical legacy? The answer is yes. Apart from being the first KMT chairman to voluntarily hand over power, he would have laid the foundations for party democracy.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) is called "Mr Democracy," but while he gave Taiwan full-fledged democratic elections, he failed to establish democratic mechanisms within the KMT. Lien's legacy could be to establish a democratic procedure for the chairmanship election.
Since it was unclear if Lien would again run for election, his supporters may have been allowed to engage in their recent activities simply because of his sluggish character or an unwillingness to oppose them. But given the KMT's lack of a democratic culture, deeply rooted in past feudal evils, and the fact that his supporters already have prepared a signature document and the required NT$1 million deposit, Lien could still surprise everyone and register his candidacy before next Wednesday.
If he does, I don't think Ma will be too surprised. Ma -- who said on many occasions that he would not run for Taipei mayor -- will surely be able to make a reasonable excuse for Lien. If Lien runs for re-election, we will have to rely on Ma's determination to establish a democratic culture within the party and break the myth of "consolidated party leadership."
Jan Shou-jung is a former legislative assistant.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with