The mammoth US trade deficit with China and Beijing's apparent intransigence in curbing it are ratcheting up the rhetoric in Washington as lawmakers urge US President George W. Bush to get tough.
Calls for action include dragging China before the WTO and pressure for Beijing to revalue the yuan, which US manufacturers claim is making Chinese exports unfairly cheap.
"We need to be aggressive," Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said.
"We need to push on all fronts: Transshipment, pegging their currency, intellectual property theft. We need to hit them hard and hit them across the board," he said.
The US trade gap with China was US$162 billion last year, more than the entire deficit just a few years ago.
RESOLUTION
Graham last week proposed a Senate resolution that would urge the US Trade Representative to "immediately initiate a case" against China through the WTO's dispute settlement process for allegedly not doing enough to combat intellectual property rights infringements.
The lawmaker, who says that "intellectual property theft is rampant in China," believes an "overwhelming" majority of lawmakers would support the measure and said he hopes for a vote soon.
Should the Senate go on the record on China's trade abuses, Graham believes that the "Chinese will understand that if they want to be a member of the family of nations, they need to play by the rules."
Democratic Senator Byron Dorgan, who is co-sponsoring the resolution, also put some blame on the Bush administration. Asked what the White House could do to reduce last year's record US$617 billion trade deficit, the lawmaker said that the administration "needs to get a backbone."
Last month, the administration raised China to its Priority Watch List "for failure to effectively protect intellectual property rights and to meet its commitment to significantly reduce infringement levels, despite efforts by China's senior leadership to do so."
MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL
Dorgan said the White House needs to demand that the trade relationship with China is mutually beneficial. He believes that it is currently "hugely beneficial for China" and "very negative for our country."
Robert Portman, the new US Trade Representative, appears to be an ally of those who want to take a tougher stance on China's trade policies.
During his confirmation process, Portman said China often breaks trade rules and the first thing he would do in his new post would be to order a "top-to-bottom review of all of our trade issues with China." Portman took the oath of office late last month.
"I think we need a tougher approach," Portman said during his Senate confirmation.
"I think we need to hold China to this WTO commitment," he said.
Critics' concerns go beyond copyright breaches. They also say China should revalue its currency and prevent the counterfeiting of goods.
China is also accused of illegally subsidizing some of its industries, such as its textile manufacturers, and US unions and some lawmakers are highly critical of China's labor and environmental policies. The US recently raised trade barriers for some Chinese textiles after an international quota system expired in January, and opened the market to a flood of Chinese-produced goods.
Though China is a key US trading partner, it is also a diplomatic ally in the Bush administration's efforts to deal with North Korea and its nuclear weapons.
But Dorgan said trade is one thing and the North Korea talks are another.
"Trade should stand on its own" and not be influenced by foreign policy considerations, Dorgan said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with