If one report is correct, 70 percent of Taiwanese people support the arms procurement bill, but the bill is continually obstructed by pan-blue camp legislators (Time running out on arms bill, May 24, page 8).
The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) should initiate a grass roots protest against every legislator who opposes the bill at their offices and even at their homes. Start with the pan-blue procedure committee members, who won't even let the bill make it to the legislative floor.
In southern Taiwan, where Taiwanese consciousness is strong, a grass roots "revolution" is needed to let these legislators know who they are supposed to be representing. It is the people they represent, not the party, not their chairmen. They are paid by the people, not their party. They must serve the people, not their party.
For blue camp legislators, particularly the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), their legislative seats might be bought with illegitimate party assets. But they still have to be elected by the people. For the next three years, probably the only way to pressure these legislators is to let them know who their masters are. It is the people, not the KMT, not the People First Party (PFP), not KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Chen Ming-chung
Chicago, Illinois
US weapons not good enough
Your editorial "Time running out on arms bill" (May 24, page 8) ignores a significant function, as well as a responsibility, of the legislature. Its role is one of oversight. It's not deniable that the conflict between major political parties in Taiwan are so acute that the interests of these parties are inevitably involved in legislative process and influence the passage of bills.
However, the pan-blue camp plays the crucial role of overseeing the government, in this case on national security issues. As national security is a priority that surmounts political considerations, the blue-camp realizes that the arms bill does little to improve Taiwan's defenses, but rather, burns the taxpayers' money like oil.
Therefore, characterizing their obstruction of the arms bill as a continuation of the competition between parties or an emotional boycott against the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government is a misinterpretation of their role in the legislature.
What should be passed in the legislature must be the best policies that have endured a cost-benefit analysis. Even if the arms bill is passed today, these weapons will not arrive or be ready for operation for months or years. While the military expenditure of China is rising each year, Taiwan cannot afford either to engage in an arms race, or waste money on improper military procurement.
To sum up, what the overseeing side concerns itself with is quality. We do need to buy weaponry, but what we need is weapons that are able to make a great contribution to our defense.
Tzung Han Lu
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with