In the face of potentially devastating political pressure, the People First Party (PFP) and the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) have broken their word and reneged on a commitment to constitutional reform. Without the support of these parties, a constitutional reform bill may fail to achieve the majority support required for ratification by the National Assembly, which is to be convened for this purpose.
The drafting of the reform bill in the legislature last year may have just been one big waste of time.
After the government and opposition parties worked together to pass the constitutional reform bill in the previous legislature last year, all parties experienced a massive internal backlash, with many calling for the bill to be overturned. The PFP and the TSU now plan to simply reject the bill at the National Assembly, and are already calling for the threshold the bill's ratification by the assembly to be raised to three-quarters from one-half, further ensuring that this round of constitutional reform will come to nothing.
There was a bit of a scramble to get the bill passed in the legislature, amid pressure from the looming December legislative elections and a silent protest by veteran democracy activist Lin I-hsiung (
The same PFP and TSU legislators who voted for the bill have now simply broken faith, totally disregarding the voters who believed in their commitment to constitutional reform.
Together, the combined seats of the PFP, the TSU and independents who oppose the constitutional reform may exceed one-fourth of the total seats in the assembly. This means the ratification threshold stated in the law governing the National Assembly's exercise of power (國民大會職權行使法) that the Legislative Yuan is about to review is now crucial to whether the constitutional amendment will be stillborn. If the DPP and the KMT can maintain the threshold at a 50 percent-plus-one majority, the amendment is likely to be ratified, in light of the large number of seats the two parties hold. But if they cannot act effectively and allow the ratification threshold to be raised to three-quarters, then the amendment bill is likely to be vetoed.
Now that the PFP and TSU have broken their promise, the DPP and the KMT must ensure -- through party discipline -- that the ratification threshold is 50 percent, if they are to secure the constitutional amendment. If they claim to support it, but allow their legislators to vote as they please, their hypocrisy will be evident to all.
DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (
As things stand now, only a majority of more than half the assembly can veto constitutional amendments. If the ratification threshold is raised to three-quarters of the assembly, then the ability of the minority to veto the majority will become the most significant rule in the game of constitutional amendment.
Although amendments should be implemented with caution, and should not be carried out before a public consensus is reached, the consensus of the majority should not be discarded in favor of the interests of a few political groups.
The Taiwanese people expect the legislature to maintain the threshold of 50 percent so the National Assembly can pass the amendment. If it is vetoed by a few parties and lawmakers, how will history view this ridiculous farce?
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with