Premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) has announced he will concentrate his efforts on boosting the economy.
The principle of putting Taiwan's interests has first been agreed upon by the government and opposition alike, and if we look back at past experience, we see that such agreements between the opposing camps lead to periods of economic growth.
But if you look at the government's record for stimulating the economy over the past few years, one can see that it doesn't compare to the nation's economic miracle of the past.
The public recognizes the importance of growing the economy, but it is also necessary to note that we must not be tempted, once again, to increase spending on public construction projects.
A cursory glance at the past reveals that the majority of government measures to boost the economy have entailed increasing expenditure on public projects such as the "8800, Taiwan Advancement" and the Ten New Major Construction Projects.
Of course, injecting investment into public projects will stimulate the domestic demand in Taiwan. Nevertheless, some will suspect this type of measure is implemented with the electorate in mind, as dumping more money into these projects will probably increase subcontracting, which only creates more opportunities for local politicians.
A better way to boost the economy would involve getting the activities of transnational corporations on board with the nation's economic system.
Taiwanese enterprises, both listed and OTC companies, know how important it is for them to be located overseas. Companies which are international in scope necessarily set up holding firms as overseas tax havens, where the government can't touch their money.
This practice has concealed the real amount of economic activity of Taiwanese firms. Taiwanese companies cannot remain outside the international economic system, and the question of how to engage in trade with the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) that exists between China, Hong Kong and Macau, or the ASEAN common market, will become a major issue for the country.
If the country does not integrate more aggressively, a severing of the relationship between international corporations and the Taiwanese economy will occur.
Globalization demands that Taiwan concentrate on international relations, and establish rules and regulations governing internationalization. Otherwise, political obstacles across the Taiwan Strait will be held up as an excuse for failing to improve the economy.
Strengthening Taiwan's economy should start with already established and successful industries. Policies such as the "Two Trillion, Twin Star" investment plan and the nanotechnology project seem to imply that Taiwan is a brand new economy, and that there were no industries in the past in which we could take pride.
In fact, the nation's economic miracle was built on traditional industries. But a policy emphasizing the growth of new industries and neglecting already established ones will pay too little attention to the strengths of the country's successful industries. This is ignoring the roots on which the economy is built.
Taiwan should look carefully into what made the country such an economic miracle in the past and what policies previous governments employed to secure this success. Future success depends on going into the new frontier armed with the experience of the past.
I believe that Hsieh and others willing to work together to build a strong economy for Taiwan.
Kang Jung-bao is an associate professor in the department of accounting at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with