Vote wisely, vote DPP
Even as a Singaporean, I share the sentiments of President Chen Shui-bian (
Based on the actions and behavior of Lien and Soong since March 20, when they again lost the presidential election to Chen, I have no doubts that both men still harbor the ambition of becoming president in 2008. And that is indeed a shame, for both men's blind and selfish desire, or should I say egoistic wish, to become president has resulted in them preventing other, younger leaders such as Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) from seeking a ticket for the presidential election.
Both Lien and Soong are already in their 60s, and instead of planning for leadership renewal in their respective parties, they instead shamelessly sought to consolidate their power. And this despite Taiwanese voters having rejected both men at the presidential polls in 2000 and this year. Are they seeking a hat-trick of rejections by the voters in the 2008 presidential election? Surely such an "achievement" would warrant a place in the Guinness Book of World of Records?
As a concerned observer and friend of Taiwan, I am happy with Chen's election victory on March 20. However, the decision by the majority of voters to choose Chen as their leader for the next four years is but half a step forward to safeguard the interests and sovereignty of Taiwan. The other half-step would be taken when the voters elect a majority of DPP candidates in the legislative elections.
A reason why US President George W. Bush was able to gain support from Americans for his foreign policies over the past four years was mainly because he enjoyed the Republicans' strong support in both the Senate and House of Representatives.
Similarly, Chen requires the support of his DPP legislative colleagues to push for more reforms for Taiwan, which could only result in a better and more democratic and prosperous Taiwan four years down the road.
Given the exposed nature and character of both Lien and Soong, a non-DPP majority in the legislature will only result in the KMT-PFP legislators working together to sabotage the policies which Chen may intend to adopt over the next four years. Lien and Soong should learn a lesson or two about grace and humility from US Senator John Kerry, who conceded defeat to Bush within hours of the election results being released and even pledged to work together with Bush to unify the US. On the other hand, Lien and Soong sought to further divide Taiwan after their election defeats. A further divided Taiwan would only please communist China, and as such, we can deduce whose interests Lien and Soong are indeed seeking to further.
Taiwanese voters must be convinced that Chen is the right man to lead the nation of 23 million citizens forward. The voters' choice of Chen in 2000 and this year are two steps forward, but should the DPP fail to win a majority in the coming legislative election, that would be two steps backward. Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen have both worked hard and courageously to build a Taiwanese individual identity, with Taiwan as a sovereign nation.
The voters must not allow such hard work to be wasted by the actions and agenda of a few elderly men who apparently seem more intent on serving their own interests.
As a foreigner, it is my humble wish to see a more progressive Taiwan, free of threats from any other nations. And that would only be possible with a clear DPP victory at the polls next Saturday. On Dec. 11, I will be watching Taiwanese pop princess Jolin Tsai (
The future of Taiwan could be affected by the election results next weekend. I urge Taiwanese to vote wisely -- there is only one apparent and clear voice -- the DPP. Support Chen and the DPP to further improve the lives of Taiwanese and the strength of Taiwan as a sovereign nation.
Jason Lee Boon Hong
Singapore
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with