On Oct. 28, the People's Bank of China announced it would raise the one-year interest rate by 0.27 percent to 5.58 percent from 5.31 percent -- the first rate hike in over nine years. Why did China raise its interest rate? Will it continue to raise the rate? Will this affect the yuan's exchange rate?
Basically, there are three reasons behind the rate hike. First, the speedy growth in "investment in fixed assets" that has overheated China's economy has not been completely reined in, showing that Beijing's macroeconomic control measures have not yet cooled down the overheated economic growth. Total investment in fixed assets grew by 26.7 percent last year, and by 43.5 percent to its highest peak in March, causing much concern about the economy. After Beijing officially launched its new control measures in April, investment still grew by 30.3 percent in the first eight months.
Second, inflation pressure is still high. China's inflation rate jumped 4.2 percent points within a year -- hitting 5.3 percent in July and August, from only 1.1 percent last September. Although the Chinese government claims that higher food prices, which trigger inflation, will decline after the abundant autumn harvest, no major price drop has yet been seen. On the contrary, growth in prices for non-food items gradually increased to 1 percent in August from 0.1 percent in January, as China's overall price levels remain high.
Moreover, as international oil prices move above US$50 a barrel, this has caused prices of Chinese commodities to climb. Viewing the latest figure in August, Chinese commodity prices grew were up 6.8 to 12.9 percent from the same period last year.
Third, people's savings have continuously dropped, decreasing banks' liquid funds and increasing financial risk. Due to inflation, seen since last October, the actual one-year deposit rate has become negative, sinking to minus 3.72 percent in August. As a result of the negative figure, growth in deposits has slipped month by month, and savings grew by a mere 15.3 percent in August, which was 4.7 percent lower than the rate in August of last year, marking seven months of consecutive decline.
Between June and September, the US raised its interest rate three times, or a total of 0.75 percent, providing a good external environment for China's rate hike. Still, the 0.27-percent hike may not resolve the cause of the overheated economy: massive foreign exchange that is flooding into China's market due to its low exchange rate.
Since last year, the People's Bank of China has been forced to absorb more than US$10 billion of foreign exchange every month to maintain the fixed exchange rate. The amount in July was still as high as US$12.4 billion. This phenomenon has seriously interfered with the autonomy of China's currency policy.
Additionally, China's "unidentified" foreign exchange reached US$50.3 billion in late August, which was US$17.6 billion, or 53.8 percent, higher than that of the same period last year. Rampant "hot money" in China may become even worse this year.
The 0.27-percent hike was indeed insignificant. It does little to relieve inflation pressure, not to mention that investors may expect more rate hikes in the future. Such expectations will bring more money into China's market, and will increase appreciation pressure on the yuan.
So the rate hike can hardly cool down the overheated economy. It will lead to greater expectation for the yuan's appreciation, and even more foreign exchange will flow into the market, overheating the economy while causing a new wave of pressure for more interest rate hikes.
Tung Chen-yuan is an associate research fellow at the Institute of International Relations at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with