On Thursday, the Taiwan Professional Civil Engineers Association released its report on the flooding
of Sanchung City, suggesting that the Taipei City Government's Department of Rapid Transit Systems and MRT contractors share responsibility for the disaster.
But let's cut to the chase. Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (
It makes sense for political appointees to take political responsibility. This is in no way inconsistent with the Control Yuan's investigation of administrative flaws -- they are different processes of accountability.
The flooding resulted from Taipei City's poor supervision and caused significant losses to almost 20,000 households. As a political appointee, Department of Rapid Transit Systems director Chang Chi-teh (
The Control Yuan will inspect the Tungan pumping station in Sanchung on Monday and clarify which parties are to be held responsible. So Chang will probably be investigated next week, and thus Ma's announcement that he would transfer the case to the Control Yuan for investigation was redundant. Is Ma in fact trying to avoid discussion of Chang's possible responsibility as a political appointee? Is he trying to extend the battlefront so that Chang has more room to maneuver?
Mayor Ma said he would wait for reports to be submitted before punishing officials. Seven days have passed since then, and now Ma says he will await the results of an assessment by the Control Yuan. Such vacillation points to a city government that does not take its responsibilities seriously.
Compare this to the situation in Kaohsiung when a residential block was damaged due to subsidence caused by construction of the MRT system there. The director of the Department of Rapid Transit Systems resigned immediately. This not only reinforced the idea that political appointees should take responsibility, but also showed that Mayor Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) is someone who will not shield the negligent. In this way a government can maintain public confidence.
Ma has missed two opportunities to display courage and resolve. His actions in this affair have further damaged his leadership. In 2001, when Typhoon Nari hit the country, Ma's government failed to respond in time, which resulted in extensive flooding throughout the city. This was one of the more difficult obstacles that Ma had to overcome in his re-election campaign.
Now, with tens of thousands of people suffering significant financial loss, Ma will surely find that when he steps outside his safe-haven electorate of Taipei City and runs for higher office, a political price will be paid for his behavior.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with