Protect social rights
Eugene Lin's equation of social rights with dictatorial government ("Avoid socialist temptation," Letters, page 8, Aug. 3) is not only false but also harmful to poorer members of society. As someone involved in promoting socio-economic rights, I feel it is my duty to reply.
The whole UN system of human rights works as a whole. It is unhealthy to opt for civil rights, for instance, while neglecting cultural rights, or choose social rights but not political rights. The ROC helped draft the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which includes rights in five areas: civil, political, social, economic and cultural. The ROC also signed the two covenants which enshrine these rights in international law.
Claiming a right does not mean, as Liu thinks, depending on the government to provide education, shelter, and health care. The government has the responsibility to ensure that these things are provided in the country and must step in directly for the poorest people who need help, but a government can allow for private schools, medical care and insurance as well as what is provided directly by the state. This is the case in Taiwan today. Nonetheless, social groups are right to stress socio-economic rights at times when they could be forgotten. Workers suffer when their bosses close factories or move them to other countries. Pure capitalism's belief that the free pursuit of money necessarily leads to wealth for all is not the experience of many poorer people in society.
If a farmer suffers because the country has joined the WTO then the state has a duty to protect his interests since his suffering is a result of a decision by the state. Taiwan can be proud of having a more equitable spread of wealth than some of her neighbors, but if we neglect socio-economic rights that achievement will be undermined and Taiwan will become a society of two cities: the rich and the poor.
Edmund Ryden SJ
Socio-Cultural Research
Center, Fujen University
Hsinchuang
Foreign students beneficial
Minister of Education Tu Cheng-sheng's (
There are long-term benefits for the people of Taiwan to have students live and study there. Many Chinese-language students now go to China where the cost of living may be cheaper, but the teachers and textbooks are often poor. Impressionable students establish life-long relationships and values during language training.
I greatly benefited from the government's support when earning my graduate degree in Taiwan and can attest to the excellent teachers and educational system at Fu Jen University and National Chengchi University. The government's continued support for language centers and foreign students could further advance Taiwan's long-term interests abroad.
William Carleton Baum
Washington
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with